CrPC 195 to BNSS 215: Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence
Section 195 CrPC (1973) replaced by Section 215 BNSS (2023)
CrPC 195 to BNSS 215 at a Glance
Section 195 CrPC (Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence) is now Section 215 BNSS, in force from 1 July 2024. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From CrPC 195 to BNSS 215?
Section 195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 became Section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. In substance, Section 215(1)(a)(iii) BNSS expands who may make a written complaint by adding another public servant authorised by the concerned public servant. Section 215(2) BNSS correspondingly extends the power to order withdrawal of such a complaint to the public servant who granted that authorisation. Section 215(1)(a)(i) BNSS also excludes Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from the range of Sections 206 to 223, although its source, Section 174A of the Indian Penal Code, fell within Sections 172 to 188, so that offence falls outside the complaint requirement. Renumbering, updating penal cross-references, and omitting Provincial in Section 215(3) BNSS are changes of form.
CrPC 195 vs BNSS 215: Comparison Table
| Aspect | CrPC 1973 (repealed) | BNSS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 195 | 215 |
| Heading | Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence | Same |
| Sub-sections | 4 sub-sections | Same |
CrPC 195 and BNSS 215: Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 195, CrPC 1973
Section 215, BNSS 2023
When It Applies: CrPC 195 vs BNSS 215
- Under Section 195(1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 172 to 188, both inclusive, of the Indian Penal Code, or of any abetment, attempt, or criminal conspiracy to commit such an offence, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or another public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate.
- No Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 193 to 196, both inclusive, 199, 200, 205 to 211, both inclusive, and 228 of the Indian Penal Code when alleged to have been committed in or in relation to any proceeding in any Court, or of any criminal conspiracy to commit, attempt to commit, or abetment of any offence specified in Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC or Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC, except on the complaint in writing of that Court, an officer of that Court authorised in writing in that behalf, or a Court to which that Court is subordinate.
- Under Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC and Section 195(1)(b)(iii) CrPC, no Court shall take cognizance of any offence described in Section 463 or punishable under Section 471, Section 475, or Section 476 of the Indian Penal Code when alleged to have been committed in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a Court proceeding, or of any criminal conspiracy to commit, attempt to commit, or abetment of any offence specified in Section 195(1)(b)(i) CrPC or Section 195(1)(b)(ii) CrPC, except on the complaint in writing of that Court, its officer authorised in writing, or a superior Court.
- Where a public servant has made a complaint under Section 195(1)(a) CrPC, any authority to which he is administratively subordinate may order its withdrawal and send a copy of the order to the Court, upon receipt of which no further proceedings shall be taken, though the proviso limits this power by barring withdrawal if the trial in the Court of first instance has been concluded.
- For Section 195(1)(b) CrPC, a Court means a Civil, Revenue, or Criminal Court and includes a tribunal declared by a Central, Provincial, or State Act to be a Court for Section 195 CrPC, and it is deemed subordinate to the ordinary appellate Court or, for a Civil Court without ordinary appeal, the local Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, subject to the provisos selecting the appellate Court of inferior jurisdiction when appeals lie to more than one Court and selecting the Civil or Revenue appellate Court according to the nature of the proceeding.
- Under Section 215(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, no Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 206 to 223, both inclusive but excluding Section 209, of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, or of any abetment, attempt, or criminal conspiracy to commit such an offence, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned, another public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate, or another public servant authorised by the concerned public servant to do so.
- No Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under Sections 229 to 233, both inclusive, 236, 237, 242 to 248, both inclusive, and 267 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 when alleged to have been committed in or in relation to any proceeding in any Court, or of any criminal conspiracy to commit, attempt to commit, or abetment of any offence specified in Section 215(1)(b)(i) BNSS or Section 215(1)(b)(ii) BNSS, except on the complaint in writing of that Court, an officer of that Court authorised in writing in that behalf, or a Court to which that Court is subordinate.
- Under Section 215(1)(b)(ii) BNSS and Section 215(1)(b)(iii) BNSS, no Court shall take cognizance of any offence described in Section 336(1) or punishable under Section 340(2) or Section 342 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 when alleged to have been committed in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a Court proceeding, or of any criminal conspiracy to commit, attempt to commit, or abetment of any offence specified in Section 215(1)(b)(i) BNSS or Section 215(1)(b)(ii) BNSS, except on the complaint in writing of that Court, its officer authorised in writing, or a superior Court.
- Where a complaint has been made under Section 215(1)(a) BNSS by a public servant or by another public servant authorised by him, any authority to which he is administratively subordinate or who has authorised that public servant may order its withdrawal and send a copy of the order to the Court, upon receipt of which no further proceedings shall be taken, though the proviso limits this power by barring withdrawal if the trial in the Court of first instance has been concluded.
- For Section 215(1)(b) BNSS, a Court means a Civil, Revenue, or Criminal Court and includes a tribunal declared by a Central or State Act to be a Court for Section 215 BNSS, and it is deemed subordinate to the ordinary appellate Court or, for a Civil Court without ordinary appeal, the local Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, subject to the provisos selecting the appellate Court of inferior jurisdiction when appeals lie to more than one Court and selecting the Civil or Revenue appellate Court according to the nature of the proceeding.
What CrPC 195 to BNSS 215 Means in Practice
FAQs: CrPC 195 to BNSS 215
How did the rule on who may file a complaint for contempt of a public servant's lawful authority change between Section 195 CrPC and Section 215 BNSS?▼
Section 195(1)(a)(iii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 allowed a Court to take cognizance only on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he was administratively subordinate. Section 215(1)(a)(iii) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 retains both of those categories and adds a third category, permitting the complaint in writing to be made by some other public servant who is authorised by the concerned public servant to do so.
What changed regarding the withdrawal of a complaint under Section 215(2) BNSS compared to Section 195(2) CrPC?▼
Under Section 195(2) CrPC, where a public servant made a complaint under Section 195(1)(a) CrPC, only an authority to which he was administratively subordinate could order its withdrawal. Section 215(2) BNSS extends this rule to complaints made by a public servant authorised by him, and allows either an administratively superior authority or the authorising public servant to order the withdrawal. In both provisions, the proviso bars withdrawal if the trial in the Court of first instance has been concluded.
Did the rules for Court complaints under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC change in Section 215(1)(b) BNSS?▼
The requirement in Section 215(1)(b) BNSS that cognizance can be taken only on the complaint in writing of that Court, an officer of that Court authorised in writing, or a superior Court is unchanged from Section 195(1)(b) CrPC. In a change of form, Section 215(1)(b) BNSS replaces the Indian Penal Code section numbers with the corresponding provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Similarly, Section 215(3) BNSS omits the word Provincial in a change of form, while Section 215(4) BNSS is unchanged.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 26 Oct 2026 ·