CrPC 246→BNSS 269

CrPC 246 to BNSS 269: Procedure where accused is not discharged

Section 246 CrPC (1973) replaced by Section 269 BNSS (2023)

View CrPC Section 246 →View BNSS Section 269 →

CrPC 246 to BNSS 269 at a Glance

Section 246 CrPC (Procedure where accused is not discharged) is now Section 269 BNSS, in force from 1 July 2024. What changed is set out below.

What Changed From CrPC 246 to BNSS 269?

From 1 July 2024, Section 246 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is replaced by Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The heading is the same, and Section 269(1) BNSS to Section 269(6) BNSS have the same text as Section 246(1) CrPC to Section 246(6) CrPC. Section 269(7) BNSS adds a provision on prosecution witnesses whose attendance cannot be secured for cross-examination. Section 246 CrPC has no counterpart to Section 269(7) BNSS.

CrPC 246 vs BNSS 269: Comparison Table

AspectCrPC 1973 (repealed)BNSS 2023 (in force)
Section246269
HeadingProcedure where accused is not dischargedSame
Sub-sections6 sub-sections7 sub-sections

CrPC 246 and BNSS 269: Bare Act Text Side by Side

CrPC 1973 (repealed)

Section 246, CrPC 1973

246. Procedure where accused is not discharged.—(1) If, when such evidence has been taken, or at any previous stage of the case, the Magistrate is of opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence triable under this Chapter, which such Magistrate is competent to try and which, in his opinion, could be adequately punished by him, he shall frame in writing a charge against the accused. (2) The charge shall then be read and explained to the accused, and he shall be asked whether he pleads guilty or has any defence to make. (3) If the accused pleads guilty, the Magistrate shall record the plea, and may, in his discretion, convict him thereon. (4) If the accused refuses to plead, or does not plead or claims to be tried or if the accused is not convicted under sub-section (3), he shall be required to state, at the commencement of the next hearing of the case, or, if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, forthwith, whether he wishes to cross-examine any, and, if so, which, of the witnesses for the prosecution whose evidence has been taken. (5) If he says he does so wish, the witnesses named by him shall be recalled and, after cross-examination and re-examination (if any), they shall be discharged. (6) The evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross-examination and re-examination (if any), they shall also be discharged.
BNSS 2023 (in force)

Section 269, BNSS 2023

269. Procedure where accused is not discharged.—(1) If, when such evidence has been taken, or at any previous stage of the case, the Magistrate is of opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence triable under this Chapter, which such Magistrate is competent to try and which, in his opinion, could be adequately punished by him, he shall frame in writing a charge against the accused. (2) The charge shall then be read and explained to the accused, and he shall be asked whether he pleads guilty or has any defence to make. (3) If the accused pleads guilty, the Magistrate shall record the plea, and may, in his discretion, convict him thereon. (4) If the accused refuses to plead, or does not plead or claims to be tried or if the accused is not convicted under sub-section (3), he shall be required to state, at the commencement of the next hearing of the case, or, if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, forthwith, whether he wishes to cross-examine any, and, if so, which, of the witnesses for the prosecution whose evidence has been taken. (5) If he says he does so wish, the witnesses named by him shall be recalled and, after cross-examination and re-examination (if any), they shall be discharged. (6) The evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross-examination and re-examination (if any), they shall also be discharged. (7) Where, despite giving opportunity to the prosecution and after taking all reasonable measures under this Sanhita, if the attendance of the prosecution witnesses under sub-sections (5) and (6) cannot be secured for cross-examination, it shall be deemed that such witness has not been examined for not being available, and the Magistrate may close the prosecution evidence for reasons to be recorded in writing and proceed with the case on the basis of the materials on record.

When It Applies: CrPC 246 vs BNSS 269

Under CrPC 246
  1. Under Section 246(1) CrPC, the Magistrate shall frame in writing a charge against the accused if, when such evidence has been taken, or at any previous stage of the case, the Magistrate is of opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence triable under the Chapter, which the Magistrate is competent to try and which, in his opinion, could be adequately punished by him.
  2. Under Section 246(2) CrPC, the charge shall then be read and explained to the accused, and the accused shall be asked whether the accused pleads guilty or has any defence to make.
  3. Under Section 246(3) CrPC, if the accused pleads guilty, the Magistrate shall record the plea and may, in his discretion, convict the accused on it.
  4. Under Section 246(4) CrPC, an accused who refuses to plead, does not plead, claims to be tried, or is not convicted under Section 246(3) CrPC shall be required to state whether the accused wishes to cross-examine any of the prosecution witnesses whose evidence has been taken, and if so, which of them.
  5. Under Section 246(5) CrPC, if the accused says the accused so wishes, the witnesses named by the accused shall be recalled and, after cross-examination and any re-examination, they shall be discharged.
  6. Under Section 246(6) CrPC, the evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross-examination and any re-examination, they shall also be discharged.
Under BNSS 269
  1. Under Section 269(1) BNSS, the Magistrate shall frame in writing a charge against the accused if, when such evidence has been taken, or at any previous stage of the case, the Magistrate is of opinion that there is ground for presuming that the accused has committed an offence triable under the Chapter, which the Magistrate is competent to try and which, in his opinion, could be adequately punished by him.
  2. Under Section 269(2) BNSS, the charge shall then be read and explained to the accused, and the accused shall be asked whether the accused pleads guilty or has any defence to make.
  3. Under Section 269(3) BNSS, if the accused pleads guilty, the Magistrate shall record the plea and may, in his discretion, convict the accused on it.
  4. Under Section 269(4) BNSS, an accused who refuses to plead, does not plead, claims to be tried, or is not convicted under Section 269(3) BNSS shall be required to state whether the accused wishes to cross-examine any of the prosecution witnesses whose evidence has been taken, and if so, which of them.
  5. Under Section 269(5) BNSS, if the accused says the accused so wishes, the witnesses named by the accused shall be recalled and, after cross-examination and any re-examination, they shall be discharged.
  6. Under Section 269(6) BNSS, the evidence of any remaining witnesses for the prosecution shall next be taken, and after cross-examination and any re-examination, they shall also be discharged.
  7. Under Section 269(7) BNSS, where, despite giving opportunity to the prosecution and after taking all reasonable measures under the Sanhita, the attendance of the prosecution witnesses under Section 269(5) BNSS and Section 269(6) BNSS cannot be secured for cross-examination, it shall be deemed that such witness has not been examined for not being available, and the Magistrate may close the prosecution evidence for reasons to be recorded in writing and proceed with the case on the basis of the materials on record.

Time Limits: CrPC 246 to BNSS 269

Under CrPC 246
  • Under Section 246(4) CrPC, the accused shall be required to state at the commencement of the next hearing of the case whether the accused wishes to cross-examine any of the prosecution witnesses whose evidence has been taken.Act text: “at the commencement of the next hearing of the case”
  • Under Section 246(4) CrPC, if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, the accused shall be required to state this forthwith.Act text: “if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, forthwith”
Under BNSS 269
  • Under Section 269(4) BNSS, the accused shall be required to state at the commencement of the next hearing of the case whether the accused wishes to cross-examine any of the prosecution witnesses whose evidence has been taken.Act text: “at the commencement of the next hearing of the case”
  • Under Section 269(4) BNSS, if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, the accused shall be required to state this forthwith.Act text: “if the Magistrate for reasons to be recorded in writing so thinks fit, forthwith”

What CrPC 246 to BNSS 269 Means in Practice

Section 246 CrPC ends with the evidence of the remaining prosecution witnesses in Section 246(6) CrPC. Section 269(7) BNSS adds that, where the attendance of the prosecution witnesses under Section 269(5) BNSS and Section 269(6) BNSS cannot be secured for cross-examination despite opportunity to the prosecution and all reasonable measures under the Sanhita, it shall be deemed that such witness has not been examined for not being available, and the Magistrate may close the prosecution evidence for reasons to be recorded in writing and proceed with the case on the basis of the materials on record.

FAQs: CrPC 246 to BNSS 269

Which provision replaces Section 246 CrPC from 1 July 2024?▼

From 1 July 2024, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and Section 246 CrPC is found in Section 269 BNSS. Section 246(1) CrPC is found in Section 269(1) BNSS, Section 246(2) CrPC in Section 269(2) BNSS, Section 246(3) CrPC in Section 269(3) BNSS, Section 246(4) CrPC in Section 269(4) BNSS, Section 246(5) CrPC in Section 269(5) BNSS and Section 246(6) CrPC in Section 269(6) BNSS.

Is the text of Section 246(1) CrPC to Section 246(6) CrPC different in Section 269 BNSS?▼

No. Section 269(1) BNSS to Section 269(6) BNSS have the same text as Section 246(1) CrPC to Section 246(6) CrPC, and the heading is the same.

What does Section 269(7) BNSS add to Section 246 CrPC?▼

Section 269(7) BNSS adds that, where despite giving opportunity to the prosecution and after taking all reasonable measures under the Sanhita the attendance of the prosecution witnesses under Section 269(5) BNSS and Section 269(6) BNSS cannot be secured for cross-examination, it shall be deemed that such witness has not been examined for not being available, and the Magistrate may close the prosecution evidence for reasons to be recorded in writing and proceed with the case on the basis of the materials on record. Section 246 CrPC has no counterpart to Section 269(7) BNSS.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 22 Oct 2026 ·