CrPC 329→BNSS 368

CrPC 329 to BNSS 368: Procedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before Court

Section 329 CrPC (1973) replaced by Section 368 BNSS (2023)

View CrPC Section 329 →View BNSS Section 368 →

CrPC 329 to BNSS 368 at a Glance

Section 329 CrPC (Procedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before Court) is now Section 368 BNSS, in force from 1 July 2024. What changed is set out below.

What Changed From CrPC 329 to BNSS 368?

From 1 July 2024, Section 368 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replaced Section 329 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Section 368(1) BNSS reads unsoundness of mind and incapacity where Section 329(1) CrPC read unsoundness and incapacity. The Medical Board clause in the proviso to Section 368(2) BNSS reads the nearest Government medical college where the proviso to Section 329(1A) CrPC read the nearest medical college. Section 368(4) BNSS reads intellectual disability where Section 329(3) CrPC read mental retardation. Section 368(3) BNSS and Section 368(4) BNSS cite Section 369 BNSS where Section 329(2) CrPC and Section 329(3) CrPC cited Section 330 CrPC. The sub-sections are renumbered, with Section 329(1A) CrPC becoming Section 368(2) BNSS.

CrPC 329 vs BNSS 368: Comparison Table

AspectCrPC 1973 (repealed)BNSS 2023 (in force)
Section329368
HeadingProcedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before CourtSame
Sub-sections4 sub-sectionsSame
Cross-referencess.330s.369

CrPC 329 and BNSS 368: Bare Act Text Side by Side

CrPC 1973 (repealed)

Section 329, CrPC 1973

329. Procedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before Court.—(1) If at the trial of any person before a Magistrate or Court of Session, it appears to the Magistrate or Court that such person is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence, the Magistrate or Court shall, in the first instance, try the fact of such unsoundness and incapacity, and if the Magistrate or Court, after considering such medical and other evidence as may be produced before him or it, is satisfied of the fact, he or it shall record a finding to that effect and shall postpone further proceedings in the case. (1A) If during trial, the Magistrate or Court of Sessions finds the accused to be of unsound mind, he or it shall refer such person to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist for care and treatment, and the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, as the case may be shall report to the Magistrate or Court whether the accused is suffering from unsoundness of mind: Provided that if the accused is aggrieved by the information given by the psychiatric or clinical psychologist, as the case may be, to the Magistrate, he may prefer an appeal before the Medical Board which shall consist of— (a) head of psychiatry unit in the nearest government hospital; and (b) a faculty member in psychiatry in the nearest medical college. (2) If such Magistrate or Court is informed that the person referred to in sub-section (1A) is a person of unsound mind, the Magistrate or Court shall further determine whether unsoundness of mind renders the accused incapable of entering defence and if the accused is found so incapable, the Magistrate or Court shall record a finding to that effect and shall examine the record of evidence produced by the prosecution and after hearing the advocate of the accused but without questioning the accused, if the Magistrate or Court finds that no prima facie case is made out against the accused, he or it shall, instead of postponing the trial, discharge the accused and deal with him in the manner provided under section 330: Provided that if the Magistrate or Court finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, he shall postpone the trial for such period, as in the opinion of the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, is required for the treatment of the accused. (3) If the Magistrate or Court finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused and he is incapable of entering defence by reason of mental retardation, he or it shall not hold the trial and order the accused to be dealt with in accordance with section 330.
BNSS 2023 (in force)

Section 368, BNSS 2023

368. Procedure in case of person of unsound mind tried before Court.—(1) If at the trial of any person before a Magistrate or Court of Session, it appears to the Magistrate or Court that such person is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence, the Magistrate or Court shall, in the first instance, try the fact of such unsoundness of mind and incapacity, and if the Magistrate or Court, after considering such medical and other evidence as may be produced before him or it, is satisfied of the fact, he or it shall record a finding to that effect and shall postpone further proceedings in the case. (2) If during trial, the Magistrate or Court of Session finds the accused to be of unsound mind, he or it shall refer such person to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist for care and treatment, and the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, as the case may be, shall report to the Magistrate or Court whether the accused is suffering from unsoundness of mind: Provided that if the accused is aggrieved by the information given by the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, as the case may be, to the Magistrate, he may prefer an appeal before the Medical Board which shall consist of— (a) head of psychiatry unit in the nearest Government hospital; and (b) a faculty member in psychiatry in the nearest Government medical college. (3) If the Magistrate or Court is informed that the person referred to in sub-section (2) is a person of unsound mind, the Magistrate or Court shall further determine whether the unsoundness of mind renders the accused incapable of entering defence and if the accused is found so incapable, the Magistrate or Court shall record a finding to that effect and shall examine the record of evidence produced by the prosecution and after hearing the advocate of the accused but without questioning the accused, if the Magistrate or Court finds that no prima facie case is made out against the accused, he or it shall, instead of postponing the trial, discharge the accused and deal with him in the manner provided under section 369: Provided that if the Magistrate or Court finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, he shall postpone the trial for such period, as in the opinion of the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, is required for the treatment of the accused. (4) If the Magistrate or Court finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused and he is incapable of entering defence by reason of intellectual disability, he or it shall not hold the trial and order the accused to be dealt with in accordance with section 369.

When It Applies: CrPC 329 vs BNSS 368

Under CrPC 329
  1. Section 329(1) CrPC applies when, at the trial of any person before a Magistrate or Court of Session, it appears that the person is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence. The Magistrate or Court shall first try the fact of such unsoundness and incapacity.
  2. If the Magistrate or Court is satisfied of the fact after considering the medical and other evidence produced before him or it, he or it shall record a finding to that effect and shall postpone further proceedings in the case.
  3. Under Section 329(1A) CrPC, if the Magistrate or Court of Session finds during trial that the accused is of unsound mind, the accused is referred to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist for care and treatment. The psychiatrist or clinical psychologist shall report whether the accused is suffering from unsoundness of mind.
  4. Under the proviso to Section 329(1A) CrPC, an accused who is aggrieved by the information given to the Magistrate may prefer an appeal before the Medical Board.
  5. The Medical Board shall consist of the head of psychiatry unit in the nearest government hospital and a faculty member in psychiatry in the nearest medical college.
  6. Under Section 329(2) CrPC, when the Magistrate or Court is informed that the person is of unsound mind, the Magistrate or Court shall further determine whether the unsoundness of mind renders the accused incapable of entering defence. If the accused is found so incapable, the Magistrate or Court shall record a finding, examine the prosecution evidence and hear the advocate of the accused without questioning the accused. If no prima facie case is made out, the accused is discharged and dealt with under Section 330 CrPC.
  7. Under the proviso to Section 329(2) CrPC, if the Magistrate or Court finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, the trial is postponed for the period required for the treatment of the accused.
  8. Under Section 329(3) CrPC, if a prima facie case is made out against the accused and he is incapable of entering defence by reason of mental retardation, the Magistrate or Court shall not hold the trial and shall order the accused to be dealt with in accordance with Section 330 CrPC.
Under BNSS 368
  1. Section 368(1) BNSS applies when, at the trial of any person before a Magistrate or Court of Session, it appears that the person is of unsound mind and consequently incapable of making his defence. The Magistrate or Court shall first try the fact of such unsoundness of mind and incapacity.
  2. If the Magistrate or Court is satisfied of the fact after considering the medical and other evidence produced before him or it, he or it shall record a finding to that effect and shall postpone further proceedings in the case.
  3. Under Section 368(2) BNSS, if the Magistrate or Court of Session finds during trial that the accused is of unsound mind, the accused is referred to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist for care and treatment. The psychiatrist or clinical psychologist shall report whether the accused is suffering from unsoundness of mind.
  4. Under the proviso to Section 368(2) BNSS, an accused who is aggrieved by the information given to the Magistrate may prefer an appeal before the Medical Board.
  5. The Medical Board shall consist of the head of psychiatry unit in the nearest Government hospital and a faculty member in psychiatry in the nearest Government medical college.
  6. Under Section 368(3) BNSS, when the Magistrate or Court is informed that the person is of unsound mind, the Magistrate or Court shall further determine whether the unsoundness of mind renders the accused incapable of entering defence. If the accused is found so incapable, the Magistrate or Court shall record a finding, examine the prosecution evidence and hear the advocate of the accused without questioning the accused. If no prima facie case is made out, the accused is discharged and dealt with under Section 369 BNSS.
  7. Under the proviso to Section 368(3) BNSS, if the Magistrate or Court finds that a prima facie case is made out against the accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, the trial is postponed for the period required for the treatment of the accused.
  8. Under Section 368(4) BNSS, if a prima facie case is made out against the accused and he is incapable of entering defence by reason of intellectual disability, the Magistrate or Court shall not hold the trial and shall order the accused to be dealt with in accordance with Section 369 BNSS.

Time Limits: CrPC 329 to BNSS 368

Under CrPC 329
  • When a prima facie case is made out against an accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, the trial is postponed under the proviso to Section 329(2) CrPC for the period that the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist considers required for the treatment of the accused. The section fixes no number of days or months.Act text: “postpone the trial for such period, as in the opinion of the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, is required for the treatment of the accused”
Under BNSS 368
  • When a prima facie case is made out against an accused in respect of whom a finding of unsoundness of mind is arrived at, the trial is postponed under the proviso to Section 368(3) BNSS for the period that the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist considers required for the treatment of the accused. The section fixes no number of days or months.Act text: “postpone the trial for such period, as in the opinion of the psychiatrist or clinical psychologist, is required for the treatment of the accused”

What CrPC 329 to BNSS 368 Means in Practice

From 1 July 2024, the provision in Section 329 CrPC is found in Section 368 BNSS. The differences in the text are the words of mind after unsoundness in Section 368(1) BNSS, the words Government medical college in the Medical Board clause, the term intellectual disability, the section numbers cited and the numbering of the sub-sections.

FAQs: CrPC 329 to BNSS 368

How did the sub-section numbering change from Section 329 CrPC to Section 368 BNSS?▼

The sub-sections of Section 329 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were renumbered in Section 368 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Section 329(1) CrPC became Section 368(1) BNSS, Section 329(1A) CrPC became Section 368(2) BNSS, Section 329(2) CrPC became Section 368(3) BNSS and Section 329(3) CrPC became Section 368(4) BNSS. The reference in Section 329(2) CrPC to the person referred to in Section 329(1A) CrPC became a reference in Section 368(3) BNSS to the person referred to in Section 368(2) BNSS.

Did the composition of the Medical Board change between Section 329 CrPC and Section 368 BNSS?▼

Yes, in one respect. Under Section 329(1A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Medical Board consisted of the head of psychiatry unit in the nearest government hospital and a faculty member in psychiatry in the nearest medical college. Under Section 368(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the faculty member in psychiatry must be in the nearest Government medical college.

What terminology changed in Section 368(4) BNSS compared to Section 329(3) CrPC?▼

Section 329(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 applied where a prima facie case was made out and the accused was incapable of entering defence by reason of mental retardation. Section 368(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 reads intellectual disability where Section 329(3) CrPC read mental retardation, and cites Section 369 BNSS where Section 329(3) CrPC cited Section 330 CrPC. The rule against holding the trial is the same.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 22 Oct 2026 ·