IPC 172 to BNS 206: Absconding to avoid service of summons or other proceeding
Section 172 IPC (1860) replaced by Section 206 BNS (2023)
IPC 172 to BNS 206 at a Glance
Section 172 IPC (Absconding to avoid service of summons or other proceeding) is now Section 206 BNS, in force from 1 July 2024. Under the BNS it is bailable and non-cognizable. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From IPC 172 to BNS 206?
Section 172 IPC is now Section 206 BNS, with the same title and the same terms of imprisonment of one month and six months. The fines rise from five hundred rupees to five thousand rupees and from one thousand rupees to ten thousand rupees. The second limb now speaks of a Court and no longer of a Court of Justice. The BNS also sets the two limbs out as clauses a and b.
IPC 172 vs BNS 206: Comparison Table
| Aspect | IPC 1860 (repealed) | BNS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 172 | 206 |
| Offence | Absconding to avoid service of summons or other proceeding | Same |
| Punishment | Simple imprisonment for up to one month. Where the summons or notice or order is to attend in person or by agent, or to produce a document or an electronic record in a Court of Justice, simple imprisonment for up to six months. | Simple imprisonment for up to one month. Where the summons, notice or order is to attend in person or by agent, or to produce a document or an electronic record in a Court, simple imprisonment for up to six months. |
| Fine | Fine up to five hundred rupees, or up to one thousand rupees where the summons or notice or order is to attend in person or by agent, or to produce a document or an electronic record in a Court of Justice. The court may impose fine instead of imprisonment or with it. | Fine up to five thousand rupees, or up to ten thousand rupees where the summons, notice or order is to attend in person or by agent, or to produce a document or an electronic record in a Court. The court may impose fine instead of imprisonment or with it. |
| Bail | Bailable | Same |
| Cognizance | Non-Cognizable | Same |
| Compoundable | Non-Compoundable | Same |
| Triable By | Any Magistrate | Same |
IPC 172 and BNS 206: Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 172, IPC 1860
Section 206, BNS 2023
Ingredients: IPC 172 vs BNS 206
- The accused absconded
- The accused absconded in order to avoid being served with a summons, notice or order
- The summons, notice or order proceeded from a public servant
- That public servant was legally competent, as such public servant, to issue the summons, notice or order
- Absconding by the accused in order to avoid being served with a summons, notice or order
- A summons, notice or order proceeding from a public servant legally competent, as such public servant, to issue it
What IPC 172 to BNS 206 Means for Pending Cases
FAQs: IPC 172 to BNS 206
What changed when Section 172 IPC became Section 206 BNS?▼
The fines. Section 206 BNS raises the fine from five hundred rupees to five thousand rupees in the first limb and from one thousand rupees to ten thousand rupees in the second limb. The imprisonment of one month and six months is the same, and Court of Justice becomes Court.
Where does Section 172 IPC sit in the BNS?▼
In Section 206 BNS, in Chapter XIII, Of Contempts of the Lawful Authority of Public Servants.
Does Section 172 IPC or Section 206 BNS apply to an act done before 1 July 2024?▼
Section 172 IPC. Section 358 BNS repealed the IPC from 1 July 2024 but saves any liability already incurred under it, so an act done before that date is still dealt with under Section 172 IPC. Section 206 BNS governs acts done on or after 1 July 2024.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·