IPC 177 to BNS 212: Furnishing false information
Section 177 IPC (1860) replaced by Section 212 BNS (2023)
IPC 177 to BNS 212 at a Glance
Section 177 IPC (Furnishing false information) is now Section 212 BNS, in force from 1 July 2024. Under the BNS it is bailable and non-cognizable. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From IPC 177 to BNS 212?
Section 177 IPC is now Section 212 BNS, with the same title. In the first limb the maximum fine rises from one thousand rupees to five thousand rupees. The imprisonment of six months and two years is the same, and the second limb still sets no maximum for the fine. The two limbs are set out as clauses a and b, and the words or if become where. Illustration b says legally bound in place of the reference to a Regulation of 1821 of the Bengal Code, and it says the offence defined in this section in place of the latter part of this section. The Explanation refers to Section 211 BNS in place of Section 176 IPC, and its list of sections is restated by BNS section numbers and sub-sections.
IPC 177 vs BNS 212: Comparison Table
| Aspect | IPC 1860 (repealed) | BNS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 177 | 212 |
| Offence | Furnishing false information | Same |
| Punishment | Simple imprisonment for up to six months. Where the information respects the commission of an offence, or is required to prevent an offence or to apprehend an offender, imprisonment of either description for up to two years. | Same |
| Fine | Fine up to one thousand rupees on the first limb. On the second limb the section provides for fine without fixing a maximum amount. The court may impose fine instead of imprisonment or in addition to it. | Fine up to five thousand rupees under clause (a). Under clause (b) the section provides for fine without fixing a maximum amount. The court may impose fine instead of imprisonment or in addition to it. |
| Bail | Bailable | Same |
| Cognizance | Non-Cognizable | Same |
| Compoundable | Non-Compoundable | Same |
| Triable By | Any Magistrate | Same |
IPC 177 and BNS 212: Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 177, IPC 1860
Section 212, BNS 2023
Ingredients: IPC 177 vs BNS 212
- The accused was legally bound to furnish information on a subject to a public servant, as such
- The accused furnished the information as true
- The information was false
- The accused knew or had reason to believe that it was false
- If the information respects the commission of an offence, or is required to prevent an offence or to apprehend an offender, the higher punishment applies
- A legal duty on the accused to furnish information on a subject to a public servant, as such
- Furnishing of information as true by the accused that the accused knows or has reason to believe to be false
What IPC 177 to BNS 212 Means for Pending Cases
FAQs: IPC 177 to BNS 212
What changed when Section 177 IPC became Section 212 BNS?▼
The maximum fine in the first limb and some wording. Section 212 BNS raises it from one thousand rupees to five thousand rupees. The imprisonment of six months and two years is the same. The two limbs are set out as clauses a and b, illustration b says legally bound in place of the reference to the Bengal Code, and the Explanation refers to Section 211 BNS and lists BNS sections and sub-sections.
Where does Section 177 IPC sit in the BNS?▼
In Section 212 BNS, in Chapter XIII, Of Contempts of the Lawful Authority of Public Servants.
Does Section 177 IPC or Section 212 BNS apply to an act done before 1 July 2024?▼
Section 177 IPC. Section 358 BNS repealed the IPC from 1 July 2024 but saves any liability already incurred under it, so an act done before that date is still dealt with under Section 177 IPC. Section 212 BNS governs acts done on or after 1 July 2024.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·