IPC 225A to BNS 264: Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise, provided for
Section 225A IPC (1860) replaced by Section 264 BNS (2023)
IPC 225A to BNS 264 at a Glance
Section 225A IPC (Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise, provided for) is now Section 264 BNS, in force from 1 July 2024. Under the BNS it is bailable and non-cognizable. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From IPC 225A to BNS 264?
Section 225A IPC is now Section 264 BNS. The cross-references are updated from Section 221 IPC, Section 222 IPC, and Section 223 IPC to Section 259 BNS, Section 260 BNS, and Section 261 BNS, and the title removes the comma after otherwise, while substantive elements and penalties remain identical.
IPC 225A vs BNS 264: Comparison Table
| Aspect | IPC 1860 (repealed) | BNS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 225A | 264 |
| Offence | Omission to apprehend, or sufferance of escape, on part of public servant, in cases not otherwise, provided for | Same |
| Punishment | Imprisonment of either description for up to three years for intentional omission or sufferance; simple imprisonment for up to two years for negligent omission or sufferance. | Same |
| Fine | Fine is an optional alternative or addition across both the intentional and negligent limbs. | Same |
| Bail | Bailable | Same |
| Cognizance | Non-Cognizable | Same |
| Compoundable | Non-Compoundable | Same |
| Triable By | Magistrate of the first class for intentional omission or sufferance; Any Magistrate for negligent omission or sufferance | Same |
IPC 225A and BNS 264: Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 225A, IPC 1860
Section 264, BNS 2023
Ingredients: IPC 225A vs BNS 264
- The accused was a public servant legally bound as such to apprehend or keep a person in confinement
- The case is not provided for by Section 221 IPC, Section 222 IPC, Section 223 IPC, or any other law for the time being in force
- The public servant omitted to apprehend that person or suffered him to escape from confinement
- The omission or sufferance was committed either intentionally or negligently
- Public servant legally bound to apprehend or keep a person in confinement
- Residual application to cases not provided for under Section 259 BNS, Section 260 BNS, Section 261 BNS, or other enactments
- Omission to apprehend or sufferance of escape committed either intentionally or negligently
- Two-tier penalty distinguishing intentional conduct from negligent omission
What IPC 225A to BNS 264 Means for Pending Cases
FAQs: IPC 225A to BNS 264
What changed when Section 225A IPC became Section 264 BNS?▼
Section 264 BNS updates the cross-references from the older IPC sections to Section 259 BNS, Section 260 BNS, and Section 261 BNS, and omits the comma after otherwise in the title. The statutory elements, two-tier penalties, and bail classifications remain unchanged.
Where does Section 225A IPC sit in the BNS?▼
In Section 264 BNS, in Chapter XIV, Of False Evidence and Offences Against Public Justice.
Does Section 225A IPC or Section 264 BNS apply to an act done before 1 July 2024?▼
Section 225A IPC. Section 358 BNS repealed the IPC from 1 July 2024 but saves any liability already incurred under it, so an act done before that date is still dealt with under Section 225A IPC. Section 264 BNS governs acts done on or after 1 July 2024.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·