IPC 405→BNS 316(1)

IPC 405 to BNS 316(1): Criminal breach of trust

Section 405 IPC (1860) replaced by Section 316(1) BNS (2023)

View IPC Section 405 →View BNS Section 316(1) →

IPC 405 to BNS 316(1) at a Glance

Section 405 IPC (Criminal breach of trust) is now Section 316(1) BNS, in force from 1 July 2024. What changed is set out below.

What Changed From IPC 405 to BNS 316(1)?

Section 405 IPC was a definition section. Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 316(1) BNS re-enacts this definition. The definition of criminal breach of trust, Explanation 1 relating to employers deducting employees' provident fund or family pension contributions, Explanation 2 relating to employees' state insurance contributions, and illustrations a through f are carried over. In illustration c, Calcutta is modernised to Kolkata and a lakh of rupees is worded as one lakh of rupees, and in illustration d, the words in the last illustration are updated to in illustration c. The legal definition itself is substantively unchanged.

IPC 405 vs BNS 316(1): Comparison Table

AspectIPC 1860 (repealed)BNS 2023 (in force)
Section405316(1)
OffenceCriminal breach of trustSame
PunishmentNone. Section 405 IPC is a definition and prescribes no punishment of its own; criminal breach of trust is punished under Section 406 IPC through Section 409 IPC according to the capacity of the offender and the nature of the entrustment.None. Section 316(1) BNS is a definition sub-section and prescribes no punishment of its own; criminal breach of trust is punished under Section 316(2) BNS through Section 316(5) BNS according to the capacity of the offender and the nature of the entrustment.
FineNone under Section 405 IPC; fine liability is governed by the punishing provisions in Section 406 IPC through Section 409 IPC.None under Section 316(1) BNS; fine liability is governed by the punishing provisions in Section 316(2) BNS through Section 316(5) BNS.
BailNon-BailableSame
CognizanceNon-CognizableSame
CompoundableNon-CompoundableSame

IPC 405 and BNS 316(1): Bare Act Text Side by Side

IPC 1860 (repealed)

Section 405, IPC 1860

405. Criminal breach of trust.—Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust". Explanation 1.—A person, being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) or not who deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a Provident Fund or Family Pension Fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said law, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid. Explanation 2.—A person, being an employer, who deducts the employees' contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the Employees' State Insurance Fund held and administered by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation established under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948), shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said Act, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid. Illustrations (a) A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriates them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (b) A is a warehouse-keeper. Z going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (c) A, residing in Calcutta, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z's direction. Z remits a lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company's paper. A dishonestly disobeys the directions and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (d) But if A, in the last illustration, not dishonestly but in good faith, believing that it will be more for Z's advantage to hold shares in the Bank of Bengal, disobeys Z's directions, and buys shares in the Bank of Bengal, for Z, instead of buying Company's paper, here, though Z should suffer loss, and should be entitled to bring a civil action against A, on account of that loss, yet A, not having acted dishonestly, has not committed criminal breach of trust. (e) A, a revenue-officer, is entrusted with public money and is either directed by law, or bound by a contract, express or implied, with the Government, to pay into a certain treasury all the public money which he holds. A dishonestly appropriates the money. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (f) A, a carrier, is entrusted by Z with property to be carried by land or by water. A dishonestly misappropriates the property. A has committed criminal breach of trust.
BNS 2023 (in force)

Section 316(1), BNS 2023

(1) Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property, or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged, or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust, or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits criminal breach of trust. Explanation 1.—A person, being an employer of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952) or not who deducts the employee’s contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a Provident Fund or Family Pension Fund established by any law for the time being in force, shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said law, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid. Explanation 2.—A person, being an employer, who deducts the employees’ contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to the Employees’ State Insurance Fund held and administered by the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation established under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (34 of 1948) shall be deemed to have been entrusted with the amount of the contribution so deducted by him and if he makes default in the payment of such contribution to the said Fund in violation of the said Act, shall be deemed to have dishonestly used the amount of the said contribution in violation of a direction of law as aforesaid. Illustrations. (a) A, being executor to the will of a deceased person, dishonestly disobeys the law which directs him to divide the effects according to the will, and appropriates them to his own use. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (b) A is a warehouse-keeper Z going on a journey, entrusts his furniture to A, under a contract that it shall be returned on payment of a stipulated sum for warehouse room. A dishonestly sells the goods. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (c) A, residing in Kolkata, is agent for Z, residing at Delhi. There is an express or implied contract between A and Z, that all sums remitted by Z to A shall be invested by A, according to Z’s direction. Z remits one lakh of rupees to A, with directions to A to invest the same in Company’s paper. A dishonestly disobeys the directions and employs the money in his own business. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (d) But if A, in illustration (c), not dishonestly but in good faith, believing that it will be more for Z’s advantage to hold shares in the Bank of Bengal, disobeys Z’s directions, and buys shares in the Bank of Bengal, for Z, instead of buying Company’s paper, here, though Z should suffer loss, and should be entitled to bring a civil action against A, on account of that loss, yet A, not having acted dishonestly, has not committed criminal breach of trust. (e) A, a revenue-officer, is entrusted with public money and is either directed by law, or bound by a contract, express or implied, with the Government, to pay into a certain treasury all the public money which he holds. A dishonestly appropriates the money. A has committed criminal breach of trust. (f) A, a carrier, is entrusted by Z with property to be carried by land or by water. A dishonestly misappropriates the property. A has committed criminal breach of trust.

Ingredients: IPC 405 vs BNS 316(1)

Under IPC 405
  1. Entrustment of property, or of dominion over property, to the accused in any manner
  2. Dishonest misappropriation of that property or dishonest conversion of it to the offender's own use
  3. Dishonest use or disposal of the property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode of discharging the trust, or of any legal contract touching its discharge, or wilfully suffering another to do so
  4. Under Explanation 1, an employer who deducts employee contributions for a provident fund or family pension fund and defaults in payment in violation of law is deemed to have dishonestly used the money in violation of a direction of law
  5. Under Explanation 2, an employer who deducts employee contributions for the Employees' State Insurance Fund and defaults in payment in violation of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 is deemed to have dishonestly used the money in violation of a direction of law
Under BNS 316(1)
  1. Entrustment with property or dominion over property in any manner
  2. Dishonest misappropriation, conversion to own use, or use or disposal in violation of legal direction or contract

What IPC 405 to BNS 316(1) Means for Pending Cases

For Section 405 IPC (now Section 316(1) BNS): under Section 316(1) BNS, the definition of criminal breach of trust is unchanged, so a charge for an act done under the new Sanhita cites Section 316 BNS and is framed on the same statutory elements as before.

FAQs: IPC 405 to BNS 316(1)

What changed from Section 405 IPC to Section 316(1) BNS?▼

Section 316(1) BNS preserves the definition of criminal breach of trust from Section 405 IPC, along with both Explanations and all statutory illustrations. The wording updates Calcutta to Kolkata in illustration c and refers to illustration c rather than the last illustration in illustration d, with no substantive change in the legal test.

Where does Section 405 IPC sit in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?▼

Section 405 IPC is located at Section 316(1) BNS, under Chapter XVII, Of Offences Against Property.

Does Section 405 IPC or Section 316(1) BNS apply to an act done before 1 July 2024?▼

Section 405 IPC. Section 358 BNS repealed the IPC from 1 July 2024 but saves any liability already incurred under it, so an act done before that date is still dealt with under Section 405 IPC. Section 316(1) BNS governs acts done on or after 1 July 2024.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·