IPC 412 to BNS 317(3): Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity
Section 412 IPC (1860) replaced by Section 317(3) BNS (2023)
IPC 412 to BNS 317(3) at a Glance
Section 412 IPC (Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity) is now Section 317(3) BNS, in force from 1 July 2024. Under the BNS it is non-bailable and cognizable. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From IPC 412 to BNS 317(3)?
Section 412 IPC corresponds to Section 317(3) BNS. Section 317(3) BNS reproduces the text and penalties of Section 412 IPC without substantive change, retaining imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for up to ten years, and liability to fine. The provision forms the third sub-section of consolidated Section 317 BNS. Through the expanded definition of stolen property in Section 317(1) BNS, the second limb of Section 317(3) BNS now also covers property obtained by cheating when received from a person belonging to a gang of dacoits.
IPC 412 vs BNS 317(3): Comparison Table
| Aspect | IPC 1860 (repealed) | BNS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 412 | 317(3) |
| Offence | Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity | Same |
| Punishment | Imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years. | Same |
| Fine | The offender is also liable to fine. The statute does not prescribe a mandatory fine or fix a maximum amount. | Same |
| Bail | Non-Bailable | Same |
| Cognizance | Cognizable | Same |
| Compoundable | Non-Compoundable | Same |
| Triable By | Court of Session | Same |
IPC 412 and BNS 317(3): Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 412, IPC 1860
Section 317(3), BNS 2023
Ingredients: IPC 412 vs BNS 317(3)
- The property in question was stolen property
- The accused dishonestly received or retained the property, knowing or having reason to believe that possession thereof was transferred by the commission of dacoity
- In the alternative, the accused dishonestly received property known or believed to be stolen from a person whom the accused knew or had reason to believe to belong or to have belonged to a gang of dacoits
- Dishonest reception or retention of stolen property with knowledge or reason to believe that its possession was transferred by dacoity
- In the alternative, dishonest reception of stolen property from a person known or believed to belong or have belonged to a gang of dacoits
- Punishment under Section 317(3) BNS of imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years, and liability to fine
What IPC 412 to BNS 317(3) Means for Pending Cases
FAQs: IPC 412 to BNS 317(3)
What changed from Section 412 IPC to Section 317(3) BNS?▼
Section 317(3) BNS re-enacts Section 412 IPC without substantive change. Both statutory limbs, the trial forum before the Court of Session, and the punishment of imprisonment for life or rigorous imprisonment up to ten years with liability to fine are preserved.
Where does Section 412 IPC sit in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?▼
Section 412 IPC is located at Section 317(3) BNS, in Chapter XVII, Of Offences Against Property.
Does Section 412 IPC or Section 317(3) BNS apply to an act done before 1 July 2024?▼
Section 412 IPC. Section 358 BNS repealed the IPC from 1 July 2024 but saves any liability already incurred under it, so an act done before that date is still dealt with under Section 412 IPC. Section 317(3) BNS governs acts done on or after 1 July 2024.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·