IPC 475 to BNS 342(1): Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 467, or possessing counterfeit marked material
Section 475 IPC (1860) replaced by Section 342(1) BNS (2023)
IPC 475 to BNS 342(1) at a Glance
Section 475 IPC (Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 467, or possessing counterfeit marked material) is now Section 342(1) BNS, in force from 1 July 2024. Under the BNS it is bailable and non-cognizable. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From IPC 475 to BNS 342(1)?
Section 475 IPC corresponds to Section 342(1) BNS. The statutory wording and prescribed punishments of imprisonment for life or imprisonment of either description for up to seven years with liability to fine remain unchanged, with Section 338 BNS cited in place of Section 467 IPC. Section 342 BNS consolidates this provision with Section 476 IPC, which covers authenticating devices for other documents and becomes Section 342(2) BNS.
IPC 475 vs BNS 342(1): Comparison Table
| Aspect | IPC 1860 (repealed) | BNS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 475 | 342(1) |
| Offence | Counterfeiting device or mark used for authenticating documents described in section 467, or possessing counterfeit marked material | Same |
| Punishment | Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years. | Same |
| Fine | The offender is also liable to fine. The statute does not prescribe a mandatory fine or fix a maximum amount. | Same |
| Bail | Bailable | Same |
| Cognizance | Non-Cognizable | Same |
| Compoundable | Non-Compoundable | Same |
| Triable By | Magistrate of the first class | Same |
IPC 475 and BNS 342(1): Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 475, IPC 1860
Section 342(1), BNS 2023
Ingredients: IPC 475 vs BNS 342(1)
- The accused counterfeited, upon or in the substance of any material, an authenticating device or mark used for documents described in Section 467 IPC, or possessed material upon or in the substance of which such a device or mark had been counterfeited
- The accused acted with the intention that the device or mark should be used for giving the appearance of authenticity to a document then forged or thereafter to be forged on such material
- Counterfeiting upon or in the substance of any material any device or mark used for authenticating documents described in Section 338 BNS, or possessing such marked material
- Intending that such device or mark shall be used for giving the appearance of authenticity to any document then forged or thereafter to be forged on such material
What IPC 475 to BNS 342(1) Means for Pending Cases
FAQs: IPC 475 to BNS 342(1)
What changed in Section 475 IPC under the BNS?▼
The substantive offence and penalties remain identical. Section 342(1) BNS reproduces the text of Section 475 IPC, updating the reference to Section 338 BNS while retaining the penalty of imprisonment for life or up to seven years and liability to fine.
Where does Section 475 IPC sit in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?▼
It sits in Section 342(1) BNS, within Chapter XVIII, Of Offences Relating to Documents and to Property Marks.
Does Section 475 IPC or Section 342(1) BNS apply to an act done before 1 July 2024?▼
Section 475 IPC. Section 358 BNS repealed the IPC from 1 July 2024 but saves any liability already incurred under it, so an act done before that date is still dealt with under Section 475 IPC. Section 342(1) BNS governs acts done on or after 1 July 2024.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·