Section 101 BNS: Murder

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 101 BNS at a Glance

Section 101 BNS deals with murder. It replaced Section 300 IPC on 1 July 2024.

Punishment

None. Section 101 BNS is a definition and prescribes no sentence of imprisonment. Murder is punished under Section 103 BNS with death or imprisonment for life.

IPC Equivalent

Section 300 →

Section 101 BNS Bare Act Text

101. Murder

Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder,—

(a) if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death; or

(b) if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused; or

(c) if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death; or

(d) if the person committing the act by which the death is caused, knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must, in all probability, cause death, or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury as aforesaid.

Illustrations

(a) A shoots Z with the intention of killing him. Z dies in consequence. A commits murder.

(b) A, knowing that Z is labouring under such a disease that a blow is likely to cause his death, strikes him with the intention of causing bodily injury. Z dies in consequence of the blow. A is guilty of murder, although the blow might not have been sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause the death of a person in a sound state of health. But if A, not knowing that Z is labouring under any disease, gives him such a blow as would not in the ordinary course of nature kill a person in a sound state of health, here A, although he may intend to cause bodily injury, is not guilty of murder, if he did not intend to cause death, or such bodily injury as in the ordinary course of nature would cause death.

(c) A intentionally gives Z a sword-cut or club-wound sufficient to cause the death of a man in the ordinary course of nature. Z dies in consequence. Here A is guilty of murder, although he may not have intended to cause Z’s death.

(d) A without any excuse fires a loaded cannon into a crowd of persons and kills one of them. A is guilty of murder, although he may not have had a premeditated design to kill any particular individual.

Exception 1.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation, causes the death of the person who gave the provocation or causes the death of any other person by mistake or accident:

Provided that the provocation is not,—

(a) sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender as an excuse for killing or doing harm to any person;

(b) given by anything done in obedience to the law, or by a public servant in the lawful exercise of the powers of such public servant;

(c) given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence.

Explanation

Whether the provocation was grave and sudden enough to prevent the offence from amounting to murder is a question of fact.

Illustrations

(a) A, under the influence of passion excited by a provocation given by Z, intentionally kills Y, Z’s child. This is murder, in as much as the provocation was not given by the child, and the death of the child was not caused by accident or misfortune in doing an act caused by the provocation.

(b) Y gives grave and sudden provocation to A. A, on this provocation, fires a pistol at Y, neither intending nor knowing himself to be likely to kill Z, who is near him, but out of sight. A kills Z. Here A has not committed murder, but merely culpable homicide.

(c) A is lawfully arrested by Z, a bailiff. A is excited to sudden and violent passion by the arrest, and kills Z. This is murder, in as much as the provocation was given by a thing done by a public servant in the exercise of his powers.

(d) A appears as a witness before Z, a Magistrate. Z says that he does not believe a word of A’s deposition, and that A has perjured himself. A is moved to sudden passion by these words, and kills Z. This is murder.

(e) A attempts to pull Z’s nose. Z, in the exercise of the right of private defence, lays hold of A to prevent him from doing so. A is moved to sudden and violent passion in consequence, and kills Z. This is murder, in as much as the provocation was giving by a thing done in the exercise of the right of private defence.

(f) Z strikes B. B is by this provocation excited to violent rage. A, a bystander, intending to take advantage of B’s rage, and to cause him to kill Z, puts a knife into B’s hand for that purpose. B kills Z with the knife. Here B may have committed only culpable homicide, but A is guilty of murder.

Exception 2.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender in the exercise in good faith of the right of private defence of person or property, exceeds the power given to him by law and causes the death of the person against whom he is exercising such right of defence without premeditation, and without any intention of doing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence.

Illustration

Z attempts to horsewhip A, not in such a manner as to cause grievous hurt to A. A draws out a pistol. Z persists in the assault. A believing in good faith that he can by no other means prevent himself from being horsewhipped, shoots Z dead. A has not committed murder, but only culpable homicide.

Exception 3.—Culpable homicide is not murder if the offender, being a public servant or aiding a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, exceeds the powers given to him by law, and causes death by doing an act which he, in good faith, believes to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant and without ill-will towards the person whose death is caused.

Exception 4.—Culpable homicide is not murder if it is committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel and without the offender’s having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner.

Explanation

It is immaterial in such cases which party offers the provocation or commits the first assault.

Exception 5.—Culpable homicide is not murder when the person whose death is caused, being above the age of eighteen years, suffers death or takes the risk of death with his own consent.

Illustration

A, by instigation, voluntarily causes Z, a child to commit suicide. Here, on account of Z’s youth, he was incapable of giving consent to his own death; A has therefore abetted murder.

Source: Section 101, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 101 BNS in Simple Words

Section 101 BNS of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) explains when culpable homicide becomes murder. It does not apply to every death caused by a person. It applies only when the act fits one of the legal clauses showing a very high degree of intention, knowledge, or risk, such as an intention to cause death, or to cause injuries that the offender knows are likely to cause death. This section matters in serious criminal cases because it draws the line between murder and the lesser offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Courts look closely at the facts, the weapon used, the part of the body targeted, the force used, and the surrounding circumstances. The exceptions to Section 101 BNS are also important, because even a death caused intentionally may fall outside murder in some cases, such as grave and sudden provocation, private defence exceeded in good faith, or a sudden fight without premeditation. In practice, the section decides the level of charge, the possible sentence, and the entire direction of the case.

Ingredients of Section 101 BNS

  • Culpable homicide causing death of a human being
  • Doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause death, or with the intention of causing bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, or with the knowledge that the act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and is done without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death or such injury
  • Absence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the five statutory Exceptions

Punishment Under Section 101 BNS

Imprisonment

None. Section 101 BNS is a definition and prescribes no sentence of imprisonment. Murder is punished under Section 103 BNS with death or imprisonment for life.

Fine

None under Section 101 BNS. Fine is provided under the punishing provision in Section 103 BNS.

Section 101 BNS defines murder without setting a punishment. Murder is punished under Section 103 BNS with death or imprisonment for life, and the offender is also liable to fine.

Example of Section 101 BNS

In an agricultural field in Bareilly, Naresh attacks his neighbour Kamal with a heavy iron-bladed sword, intentionally striking him multiple times across the neck and chest. The wounds are sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, and Kamal dies on the spot. The act does not fall within any of the statutory Exceptions. The act is murder as defined in Section 101 BNS, punishable under Section 103(1) BNS.

When Section 101 BNS Does Not Apply

  • The act was done neither with the intention of causing death, nor with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knew to be likely to cause death, nor with the intention of causing bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, nor with knowledge that the act was so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, done without any excuse for incurring that risk
  • The act falls within Exception 1, the offender, whilst deprived of the power of self-control by grave and sudden provocation, having caused the death of the person who gave the provocation, or of any other person by mistake or accident, where the provocation was not sought or voluntarily provoked by the offender, was not given by anything done in obedience to the law or by a public servant in the lawful exercise of his powers, and was not given by anything done in the lawful exercise of the right of private defence
  • The act falls within Exception 2, the offender, in the exercise in good faith of the right of private defence of person or property, having exceeded the power given to him by law and caused the death of the person against whom he was exercising that right, without premeditation and without any intention of doing more harm than is necessary for the purpose of such defence
  • The act falls within Exception 3, the offender, being a public servant or aiding a public servant acting for the advancement of public justice, having exceeded the powers given to him by law and caused death by an act which he in good faith believed to be lawful and necessary for the due discharge of his duty as such public servant, and without ill-will towards the person whose death was caused
  • The act falls within Exception 4, having been committed without premeditation in a sudden fight in the heat of passion upon a sudden quarrel without taking undue advantage or acting in a cruel or unusual manner
  • The act falls within Exception 5, the person whose death was caused being above the age of eighteen years and having suffered death or taken the risk of death with his own consent

Section 101 BNS in the IPC (Previous Law)

Section 101 BNS replaces Section 300 IPC from the old criminal code.

Section 300 IPC is now Section 101 BNS. The four limbs of murder are set out as clauses a to d where the IPC had 2ndly, 3rdly and 4thly, and the provisos to Exception 1 appear as clauses a to c under a proviso clause. The four limbs and five Exceptions are the same in substance.

View IPC Section 300 →

FAQs on Section 101 BNS

Under Section 101 BNS, is every death caused by a person treated as murder?▼

No. The law first checks whether the act amounts to culpable homicide, and then whether it falls within Section 101 BNS. Many cases end up being treated as culpable homicide not amounting to murder, depending on intention, knowledge, and the surrounding facts.

What is the difference between Section 101 BNS and Section 100 BNS?▼

Section 100 BNS lays down the broader offence of culpable homicide. Section 101 BNS is the stricter rule that tells us when that offence becomes murder. In simple terms, Section 101 BNS is the higher threshold.

Under Section 101 BNS, can a murder charge be reduced if there was sudden provocation?▼

Yes, in some cases. If the facts fit one of the legal exceptions, especially grave and sudden provocation or a sudden fight without premeditation, the case may fall outside Section 101 BNS. The court will examine the exact facts very closely.

Does Section 101 BNS apply after the BNS came into force?▼

Yes. Section 101 BNS is the operative provision defining murder under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) for offences committed after the code came into force. Earlier offences continue to be governed by the law that was in force when they were committed.

Have questions about Section 101 BNS?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, punishment details, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru →

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 ·