Section 353 BNS: Statements conducing to public mischief

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 353 BNS at a Glance

Section 353 BNS deals with statements conducing to public mischief. It is non-bailable; it replaced Section 505 IPC on 1 July 2024.

Punishment

Imprisonment for up to three years under the first two sub-sections, and for up to five years under the third sub-section.

Non-Bailable β“˜Non-Compoundable β“˜
IPC Equivalent

Section 505 β†’

Section 353 BNS Bare Act Text

(1) Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, false information, rumour, or report, including through electronic meansβ€”

(a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army, Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty as such; or

(b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquillity; or

(c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

(2) Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement or report containing false information, rumour or alarming news, including through electronic means, with intent to create or promote, or which is likely to create or promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

(3) Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (2) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.

Exception.

It does not amount to an offence, within the meaning of this section, when the person making, publishing or circulating any such statement, false information, rumour or report, has reasonable grounds for believing that such statement, false information, rumour or report is true and makes, publishes or circulates it in good faith and without any such intent as aforesaid.

Source: Section 353, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

Section 353 BNS in the IPC (Previous Law)

Section 353 BNS replaced Section 505 IPC from 1 July 2024.

Each sub-section below names its own source.

FAQs on Section 353 BNS

Is every false statement punishable under Section 353 BNS?β–Ό

No. The statement, false information, rumour, or report must be made, published, or circulated with the intent or likelihood of causing one of the harmful effects listed in the section, such as mutiny in the armed forces, public fear or alarm inducing an offence against the State or public tranquillity, incitement of offences between communities, or feelings of enmity, hatred, or ill will between groups. Mere falsity by itself is not enough.

Can a social media post attract Section 353 BNS?β–Ό

Yes. Section 353 BNS expressly covers statements, false information, rumours, or reports made, published, or circulated through electronic means, provided the required intent or likely harmful effect under the section is present.

Under Section 353 BNS, what must the police prove in court?β–Ό

They must prove that the accused made, published, or circulated the statement, false information, rumour, or report, and that it was intended or likely to cause one of the consequences specified in Section 353 BNS.

Has Section 353 BNS changed under BNS?β–Ό

Yes. Section 353 BNS carries forward the earlier provision from the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita while expressly adding false information and circulation through electronic means. The punishments remain up to three years' imprisonment, or fine, or both under the first two sub-sections, and up to five years' imprisonment with fine under the third sub-section.

What does Section 353(2) BNS cover?β–Ό

Section 353(2) BNS covers making, publishing or circulating a statement or report containing false information, rumour or alarming news, including through electronic means. It applies when this is done with intent to create or promote, or when it is likely to create or promote, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will between different groups or communities on grounds like religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community.

What must be proved for an offence under Section 353(2) BNS?β–Ό

The text requires a statement or report containing false information, rumour or alarming news, and that it was made, published or circulated. It must also be shown that it was intended to create or promote, or was likely to create or promote, enmity, hatred or ill will between different groups or communities on the listed grounds.

What is the punishment under Section 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?β–Ό

The punishment under Section 353(2) BNS is imprisonment which may extend to three years, or fine, or both. If the offence under sub-section (2) is committed in a place of worship or in an assembly engaged in religious worship or religious ceremonies, Section 353(3) BNS provides imprisonment which may extend to five years and the offender shall also be liable to fine.

Is there any defence if I am accused under Section 353(2) BNS for a post or message?β–Ό

Yes. The exception says it is not an offence if the person had reasonable grounds for believing the statement, false information, rumour or report was true, and made, published or circulated it in good faith and without the prohibited intent. If you are accused, the exact words used, the context, and the basis on which you believed it to be true can matter.

What does Section 353(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita punish?β–Ό

Section 353(3) applies when a person commits the offence described in Section 353(2) in a place of worship or in an assembly engaged in religious worship or religious ceremonies. That means the statement or report must contain false information, rumour or alarming news, including through electronic means, and must be intended or likely to create or promote enmity, hatred or ill will between groups or communities on the listed grounds.

What has to be proved for a case under Section 353(3) BNS?β–Ό

It must be shown that the person made, published or circulated a statement or report containing false information, rumour or alarming news. It must also be shown that it was intended, or was likely, to create or promote feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will between different groups or communities, and that this happened in a place of worship or during religious worship or religious ceremonies.

What is the punishment under Section 353(3) of the BNS?β–Ό

The punishment may extend to five years' imprisonment and the person shall also be liable to fine. This is the punishment specifically given when the Section 353(2) offence is committed in a place of worship or in a religious assembly.

Is there any defence if I am accused under Section 353(3) BNS for a message or statement?β–Ό

Yes. The exception says it is not an offence if the person had reasonable grounds for believing the statement, false information, rumour or report was true, and made or circulated it in good faith and without the prohibited intent. If you are accused, the exact words used, the place, the surrounding circumstances and your basis for believing it was true can matter.

Section 353 BNS: Sub-sections Explained

Section 353(1) BNS: Statements conducing to public mischief

β–Ά

Bare Act Text

(1) Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, false information, rumour, or report, including through electronic meansβ€”

(a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army, Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty as such; or

(b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquillity; or

(c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Explained in Simple Words

Section 353 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) deals with statements that can disturb public peace or cause public harm. It applies where a person makes, publishes, or circulates any statement, false information, rumour, or report, including through electronic means, with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, mutiny or failure of duty in the armed forces, fear or alarm inducing an offence against the State or public tranquillity, incitement of one class or community to commit an offence against another, or feelings of enmity, hatred, or ill will between different groups or communities. In practical terms, this section can apply to speeches, social media posts, pamphlets, messages, or other communications.

The prosecution must show both the circulation of the statement, false information, rumour, or report and the required intent or likely effect under the section. Under the statutory exception, it is not an offence when a person has reasonable grounds for believing the material is true and shares it in good faith without the prohibited intent.

Key Ingredients

  • Making, publishing or circulating any statement, false information, rumour, or report, including through electronic means
  • Having the intent or likelihood to cause mutiny, public alarm inducing offences against the State or public tranquility, or inter-class offences
  • Promoting feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community

Punishment

Non-Bailable β“˜Non-Compoundable β“˜πŸ›οΈ Any Magistrate β“˜

πŸ”’ Imprisonment for up to three years under the first two sub-sections, and for up to five years under the third sub-section.

πŸ’° Under the first two sub-sections, fine in place of imprisonment, or both. Under the third sub-section, the offender is also liable to fine. The section sets no limit.

Statements conducing to public mischief are punishable with imprisonment for up to three years, or fine, or both, and with imprisonment for up to five years and liability to fine when the second sub-section offence is committed in a place of worship or religious assembly. Every form is non-bailable, triable by any Magistrate, and not compoundable. Only the offences under the second and third sub-sections are cognizable.

Real-World Example

Vijay posts in several local chat groups in Kanpur a fabricated message asserting that members of one community are gathering to attack the commercial premises of another community. He acts with intent to incite mutual hatred between the two communities. The message is a statement containing rumour and alarming news intended to promote feelings of enmity between religious communities. Vijay is punishable under Section 353 BNS.

When This Does Not Apply

  • The person had reasonable grounds for believing the statement, rumour or report to be true, and made, published or circulated it in good faith and without the prohibited intent
  • The statement, rumour or report was neither intended to produce nor likely to cause any of the consequences specified in the section
  • The person did not make, publish or circulate any statement, rumour or report

Previous Law

IPC 505 β†’ Section 353(1) BNS

Section 505 IPC corresponds to Section 353(1) BNS. The first two sub-sections add false information to what may be circulated, and add the words including through electronic means. The statutory Exception also refers to false information. The punishments remain unchanged.

Section 353(2) BNS: Statements conducing to public mischief

β–Ά

Bare Act Text

(2) Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement or report containing false information, rumour or alarming news, including through electronic means, with intent to create or promote, or which is likely to create or promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill will between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Explained in Simple Words

Section 353(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) punishes the making, publishing, or circulating of statements or reports containing false information, rumour, or alarming news that promote disharmony between groups. It applies to any person who makes, publishes, or circulates such material, including through electronic means, with intent to create or promote, or where it is likely to create or promote, feelings of enmity, hatred, or ill will between different religious, racial, language, or regional groups, or castes or communities, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste, community, or any other ground whatsoever.

An offender under this sub-section shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Under the Exception to Section 353 BNS, an act does not amount to an offence if the person had reasonable grounds for believing that the statement, false information, rumour, or report was true and made, published, or circulated it in good faith and without the prohibited intent.

Key Ingredients

  • Making, publishing or circulating a statement or report, including through electronic means
  • The material contains false information, rumour or alarming news
  • Intent to create or promote, or likelihood of creating or promoting, enmity, hatred or ill will
  • The enmity, hatred or ill will is between different religious, racial, language or regional groups or castes or communities
  • The promotion is on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste, community or any other ground whatsoever

Punishment

Non-Bailable β“˜Cognizable β“˜Non-Compoundable β“˜πŸ›οΈ Any Magistrate β“˜

πŸ”’ Imprisonment which may extend to three years.

πŸ’° The offender may be punished with fine alone, or with both imprisonment and fine.

Making, publishing, or circulating a statement or report containing false information, rumour, or alarming news with intent or likelihood to create or promote enmity, hatred, or ill will between different groups or communities is punishable with imprisonment for up to three years, or with fine, or with both.

Real-World Example

Late one evening near Varanasi, Manoj edited an old video of a local quarrel and posted it in several WhatsApp groups, falsely claiming that members of one caste had attacked another community and that more attacks were planned that night. Bhavna then forwarded it widely, and Sanjay repeated the same claim in a neighbourhood Telegram channel. The video and message were false and alarming. By circulating them in that form, they were at least likely to create hatred, enmity and ill will between caste groups in the area, so the conduct falls within Section 353(2) BNS.

When This Does Not Apply

  • A true report shared in good faith, with reasonable grounds for believing it to be true, and without such intent
  • A statement that is not false information, rumour or alarming news
  • A false statement that does not create or promote, and is not likely to create or promote, enmity, hatred or ill will between groups
  • A private insult or quarrel aimed at one individual, without promoting hostility between religious, racial, language, regional, caste or community groups

Section 353(3) BNS: Statements conducing to public mischief

β–Ά

Bare Act Text

(3) Whoever commits an offence specified in sub-section (2) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to fine.

Exception.

It does not amount to an offence, within the meaning of this section, when the person making, publishing or circulating any such statement, false information, rumour or report, has reasonable grounds for believing that such statement, false information, rumour or report is true and makes, publishes or circulates it in good faith and without any such intent as aforesaid.

Explained in Simple Words

Section 353(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) provides an enhanced punishment when an offence under Section 353(2) BNS is committed in a religious setting. It applies to any person who commits the offence specified in sub-section (2) in any place of worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies.

Under this sub-section, the offender shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.

For Section 353(3) BNS to apply, all the elements of Section 353(2) BNS must be satisfied, namely making, publishing, or circulating a statement or report containing false information, rumour, or alarming news, including through electronic means, with intent or likelihood to create or promote enmity, hatred, or ill will between different groups or communities. In addition, the Exception to Section 353 BNS protects a person who has reasonable grounds for believing the material is true and shares it in good faith and without the prohibited intent.

Key Ingredients

  • The person commits an offence under sub-section (2)
  • The statement or report contains false information, rumour or alarming news
  • It is made, published or circulated with intent, or likelihood, to create or promote enmity, hatred or ill will between groups or communities
  • The act happens in a place of worship, or in an assembly engaged in religious worship or religious ceremonies

Punishment

Non-Bailable β“˜Cognizable β“˜Non-Compoundable β“˜πŸ›οΈ Any Magistrate β“˜

πŸ”’ Imprisonment which may extend to five years.

πŸ’° Fine may be imposed in addition to imprisonment.

Committing an offence under Section 353(2) BNS in a place of worship or in an assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or religious ceremonies is punishable with imprisonment for up to five years, and the offender shall also be liable to fine.

Real-World Example

During an evening prayer gathering at a temple near Pune, Gopal used his phone speaker to play and share a false audio message claiming that a local caste group had attacked worshippers from another community and that people should unite against them. Sunita heard him repeat the message inside the temple compound, and Naveen saw him forward it to others there. The message was false and alarming, and it was circulated in a place of worship in a way likely to create hatred and ill will between communities. That brings it within this section.

When This Does Not Apply

  • A person shares a statement in good faith, with reasonable grounds to believe it is true, and without the prohibited intent
  • A false statement is circulated outside a place of worship and outside any assembly engaged in religious worship or religious ceremonies
  • A statement causes annoyance or argument, but does not create or promote enmity, hatred or ill will between different groups or communities
  • The material is not false information, rumour or alarming news

Have questions about Section 353 BNS?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, punishment details, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru β†’

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Β· Last updated: 16 Oct 2026 Β·