Section 356 BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Section 356 BNSS at a Glance

Section 356 BNSS deals with inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender. It has no corresponding section in the CrPC. The BNSS applies from 1 July 2024.

Section 356 BNSS Bare Act Text

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Sanhita or in any other law for the time being in force, when a person declared as a proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, it shall be deemed to operate as a waiver of the right of such person to be present and tried in person, and the Court shall, after recording reasons in writing, in the interest of justice, proceed with the trial in the like manner and with like effect as if he was present, under this Sanhita and pronounce the judgment:

Provided that the Court shall not commence the trial unless a period of ninety days has lapsed from the date of framing of the charge.

(2) The Court shall ensure that the following procedure has been complied with before proceeding under sub-section (1), namely:โ€”

(i) issuance of two consecutive warrants of arrest within the interval of at least thirty days;

(ii) publish in a national or local daily newspaper circulating in the place of his last known address of residence, requiring the proclaimed offender to appear before the Court for trial and informing him that in case he fails to appear within thirty days from the date of such publication, the trial shall commence in his absence;

(iii) inform his relative or friend, if any, about the commencement of the trial; and

(iv) affix information about the commencement of the trial on some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which such person ordinarily resides and display in the police station of the district of his last known address of residence.

(3) Where the proclaimed offender is not represented by any advocate, he shall be provided with an advocate for his defence at the expense of the State.

(4) Where the Court, competent to try the case or commit for trial, has examined any witnesses for prosecution and recorded their depositions, such depositions shall be given in evidence against such proclaimed offender on the inquiry into, or in trial for, the offence with which he is charged:

Provided that if the proclaimed offender is arrested and produced or appears before the Court during such trial, the Court may, in the interest of justice, allow him to examine any evidence which may have been taken in his absence.

(5) Where a trial is related to a person under this section, the deposition and examination of the witness, may, as far as practicable, be recorded by audio-video electronic means preferably mobile phone and such recording shall be kept in such manner as the Court may direct.

(6) In prosecution for offences under this Sanhita, voluntary absence of accused after the trial has commenced under sub-section (1) shall not prevent continuing the trial including the pronouncement of the judgment even if he is arrested and produced or appears at the conclusion of such trial.

(7) No appeal shall lie against the judgment under this section unless the proclaimed offender presents himself before the Court of appeal:

Provided that no appeal against conviction shall lie after the expiry of three years from the date of the judgment.

(8) The State may, by notification, extend the provisions of this section to any absconder mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 84.

Source: Section 356, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Section 356 BNSS in Simple Words

Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 directs a Court to conduct a trial and pronounce judgment in the absence of a proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, who has absconded to evade trial when there is no immediate prospect of arresting him.

The Sanhita treats this as a waiver of the right to be present and tried in person.

Once ninety days have lapsed from framing of the charge and mandatory warrant and notice steps are met, the Court shall record reasons in writing, in the interest of justice, and proceed as if he was present, while providing an advocate at State expense if he is unrepresented.

When Section 356 BNSS Applies

  • When a person declared as a proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, the Court shall record reasons in writing and, in the interest of justice, conduct the trial and pronounce judgment as though he were present under Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Before starting the trial in absentia under Section 356(2) BNSS, the Court shall verify that two consecutive arrest warrants were issued at least thirty days apart, a notice was published in a national or local daily newspaper circulating in the place of his last known address, any relative or friend was informed, and notice was affixed on the house or homestead and displayed at the district police station.
  • If the proclaimed offender does not have legal representation, Section 356(3) BNSS requires that he shall be given a defence advocate paid for by the State.
  • Under Section 356(4) BNSS, prosecution witness depositions recorded by a Court competent to try or commit the case shall be used as evidence against the proclaimed offender in the inquiry or trial, though a proviso allows the Court, in the interest of justice, to let him examine such evidence if he appears or is arrested and produced during the trial.
  • Under Section 356(5) and Section 356(6) BNSS, the Court may have witness examinations recorded as far as practicable by audio-video electronic means, preferably a mobile phone, and once the trial has begun under Section 356(1) BNSS, the voluntary absence of the accused shall not stop the trial or judgment even if he appears or is produced at its conclusion.
  • Under Section 356(7) BNSS, no appeal shall lie against the judgment unless the proclaimed offender presents himself before the Court of appeal, subject to the proviso that no appeal against conviction shall lie after three years from the date of the judgment, while Section 356(8) BNSS allows the State by notification to extend Section 356 BNSS to any absconder mentioned in Section 84(1) BNSS.

Time Limits Under Section 356 BNSS

  • A proviso to Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 limits the rule by barring the Court from starting the trial in absentia until ninety days have lapsed from the date of framing of the charge.Act text: โ€œunless a period of ninety days has lapsed from the date of framing of the charge.โ€
  • Before proceeding with the trial under Section 356(2)(i) BNSS, the Court shall ensure that two consecutive arrest warrants have been issued with a gap of at least thirty days between them.Act text: โ€œissuance of two consecutive warrants of arrest within the interval of at least thirty daysโ€
  • Under Section 356(2)(ii) BNSS, the published daily newspaper notice must inform the proclaimed offender that the trial shall start in his absence if he does not appear before the Court within thirty days from the publication date.Act text: โ€œin case he fails to appear within thirty days from the date of such publicationโ€
  • A proviso to Section 356(7) BNSS limits the right to appeal by barring any appeal against a conviction once three years have passed from the date of the judgment.Act text: โ€œno appeal against conviction shall lie after the expiry of three years from the date of the judgment.โ€

Example of Section 356 BNSS

Ramesh is declared a proclaimed offender after absconding to evade trial, and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him. Under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Court waits until ninety days have lapsed from framing of the charge. It ensures that two consecutive arrest warrants were issued at least thirty days apart, a notice in a daily newspaper circulating at his last known address gave him thirty days to appear, his relative was informed, and notices were affixed on his house and displayed at the district police station. As Ramesh remains absent and has no advocate, the Court provides a defence advocate at State expense, records reasons in writing in the interest of justice, tries him as if present, and pronounces judgment.

When Section 356 BNSS Does Not Apply

  • Trial in absentia under Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 cannot proceed when the accused has not been declared a proclaimed offender, has not absconded to evade trial, or when there is an immediate prospect of arresting him, unless the State has extended Section 356 BNSS by notification under Section 356(8) BNSS to an absconder mentioned in Section 84(1) BNSS.
  • Under the proviso to Section 356(1) BNSS, the Court shall not start the trial in absentia if a period of ninety days has not yet lapsed from the date of framing of the charge.
  • The Court cannot proceed under Section 356(1) BNSS if the mandatory pre-trial steps in Section 356(2) BNSS, namely two consecutive arrest warrants at an interval of at least thirty days, newspaper publication with a thirty day appearance period, notice to any relative or friend, and affixing and police station display of the notice, have not been completed.
  • An appeal under Section 356(7) BNSS does not lie if the proclaimed offender does not present himself before the Court of appeal, and under its proviso no appeal against conviction lies once three years have expired from the date of the judgment.

No Corresponding CrPC Section

The official comparison tables list no section of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the Code had no section in its place. Section 356 BNSS has no counterpart in the Code and provides for the inquiry, trial, or judgment in absentia of a proclaimed offender who has absconded to evade trial.

FAQs on Section 356 BNSS

What steps must a Court complete before starting a trial in the absence of a proclaimed offender under Section 356 BNSS?โ–ผ

Before starting a trial in absentia under Section 356 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Court shall wait until ninety days have lapsed from framing of the charge. Under Section 356(2) BNSS, it shall also ensure two consecutive arrest warrants at an interval of at least thirty days, a newspaper notice giving thirty days to appear, notice to any relative or friend, and notice affixed on the house and displayed at the district police station.

Does a proclaimed offender tried in absentia under Section 356 BNSS get a lawyer?โ–ผ

Yes. Where the proclaimed offender is not represented by any advocate, he shall be provided with an advocate for his defence at the expense of the State under Section 356(3) BNSS. This ensures that the proclaimed offender has legal representation during the trial held in his absence, even though his absconding to evade trial with no immediate prospect of arresting him operates as a waiver of his right to be present and tried in person.

What happens if the proclaimed offender appears or is arrested after the trial in absentia has already started?โ–ผ

If the proclaimed offender is arrested and produced or appears before the Court during the trial, a proviso to Section 356(4) BNSS states that the Court may, in the interest of justice, allow him to examine any evidence which may have been taken in his absence. Moreover, Section 356(6) BNSS states that voluntary absence after the trial has commenced shall not prevent continuing the trial and pronouncing judgment even if he appears or is produced at its conclusion.

How are witness depositions recorded and used in a trial under Section 356 BNSS?โ–ผ

Where a Court competent to try the case or commit for trial has examined prosecution witnesses and recorded their depositions, Section 356(4) BNSS provides that those depositions shall be given in evidence against the proclaimed offender in the inquiry or trial for the offence charged. Under Section 356(5) BNSS, the deposition and examination of the witness may, as far as practicable, be recorded by audio-video electronic means, preferably a mobile phone, and kept as the Court may direct.

Can a proclaimed offender appeal against a judgment passed in absentia under Section 356 BNSS?โ–ผ

An appeal is permitted only under strict conditions. Section 356(7) BNSS states that no appeal shall lie against the judgment unless the proclaimed offender presents himself before the Court of appeal. In addition, the proviso to Section 356(7) BNSS limits this right by stating that no appeal against conviction shall lie after the expiry of three years from the date of the judgment.

Section 356 BNSS: Sub-sections Explained

Section 356(1) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Sanhita or in any other law for the time being in force, when a person declared as a proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate prospect of arresting him, it shall be deemed to operate as a waiver of the right of such person to be present and tried in person, and the Court shall, after recording reasons in writing, in the interest of justice, proceed with the trial in the like manner and with like effect as if he was present, under this Sanhita and pronounce the judgment:

Provided that the Court shall not commence the trial unless a period of ninety days has lapsed from the date of framing of the charge.

Section 356(2) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(2) The Court shall ensure that the following procedure has been complied with before proceeding under sub-section (1), namely:โ€”

(i) issuance of two consecutive warrants of arrest within the interval of at least thirty days;

(ii) publish in a national or local daily newspaper circulating in the place of his last known address of residence, requiring the proclaimed offender to appear before the Court for trial and informing him that in case he fails to appear within thirty days from the date of such publication, the trial shall commence in his absence;

(iii) inform his relative or friend, if any, about the commencement of the trial; and

(iv) affix information about the commencement of the trial on some conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which such person ordinarily resides and display in the police station of the district of his last known address of residence.

Section 356(3) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(3) Where the proclaimed offender is not represented by any advocate, he shall be provided with an advocate for his defence at the expense of the State.

Section 356(4) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(4) Where the Court, competent to try the case or commit for trial, has examined any witnesses for prosecution and recorded their depositions, such depositions shall be given in evidence against such proclaimed offender on the inquiry into, or in trial for, the offence with which he is charged:

Provided that if the proclaimed offender is arrested and produced or appears before the Court during such trial, the Court may, in the interest of justice, allow him to examine any evidence which may have been taken in his absence.

Section 356(5) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(5) Where a trial is related to a person under this section, the deposition and examination of the witness, may, as far as practicable, be recorded by audio-video electronic means preferably mobile phone and such recording shall be kept in such manner as the Court may direct.

Section 356(6) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(6) In prosecution for offences under this Sanhita, voluntary absence of accused after the trial has commenced under sub-section (1) shall not prevent continuing the trial including the pronouncement of the judgment even if he is arrested and produced or appears at the conclusion of such trial.

Section 356(7) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(7) No appeal shall lie against the judgment under this section unless the proclaimed offender presents himself before the Court of appeal:

Provided that no appeal against conviction shall lie after the expiry of three years from the date of the judgment.

Section 356(8) BNSS: Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender

โ–ถ

Bare Act Text

(8) The State may, by notification, extend the provisions of this section to any absconder mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 84.

Have questions about Section 356 BNSS?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru โ†’

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ยท Last updated: 22 Oct 2026 ยท