Section 145 CrPC: Procedure where dispute concerning land or water is likely to cause breach of peace
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 145 CrPC at a Glance
Section 145 CrPC deals with procedure where dispute concerning land or water is likely to cause breach of peace. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 164 BNSS.
What Section 145 CrPC Says
145. Procedure where dispute concerning land or water is likely to cause breach of peace
(1) Whenever an Executive Magistrate is satisfied from a report of a police officer or upon other information that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any land or water or the boundaries thereof, within his local jurisdiction, he shall make an order in writing, stating the grounds of his being so satisfied, and requiring the parties concerned in such dispute to attend his Court in person or by pleader, on a specified date and time, and to put in written statements of their respective claims as respects the fact of actual possession of the subject of dispute.
(2) For the purposes of this section, the expression βland or waterβ includes buildings, markets, fisheries, crops or other produce of land, and the rents or profits of any such property.
(3) A copy of the order shall be served in the manner provided by this Code for the service of a summons upon such person or persons as the Magistrate may direct, and at least one copy shall be published by being affixed to some conspicuous place at or near the subject of dispute.
(4) The Magistrate shall then, without reference to the merits or the claims of any of the parties to a right to possess the subject of dispute, peruse the statements so put in, hear the parties, receive all such evidence as may be produced by them, take such further evidence, if any, as he thinks necessary, and, if possible, decide whether any and which of the parties was, at the date of the order made by him under sub-section (1), in possession of the subject of dispute:
Provided that if it appears to the Magistrate that any party has been forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed within two months next before the date on which the report of a police officer or other information was received by the Magistrate, or after that date and before the date of his order under sub-section (1), he may treat the party so dispossessed as if that party had been in possession on the date of his order under sub-section (1).
(5) Nothing in this section shall preclude any party so required to attend, or any other person interested, from showing that no such dispute as aforesaid exists or has existed; and in such case the Magistrate shall cancel his said order, and all further proceedings thereon shall be stayed, but, subject to such cancellation, the order of the Magistrate under sub-section (1) shall be final.
(6) (a) If the Magistrate decides that one of the parties was, or should under the proviso to sub-section (4) be treated as being, in such possession of the said subject, he shall issue an order declaring such party to be entitled to possession thereof until evicted therefrom in due course of law, and forbidding all disturbance of such possession until such eviction; and when he proceeds under the proviso to sub-section (4), may restore to possession the party forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed.
(b) The order made under this sub-section shall be served and published in the manner laid down in sub-section (3).
(7) When any party to any such proceeding dies, the Magistrate may cause the legal representative of the deceased party to be made a party to the proceeding and shall thereupon continue the inquiry, and if any question arises as to who the legal representative of a deceased party for the purposes of such proceeding is, all persons claiming to be representatives of the deceased party shall be made parties thereto.
(8) If the Magistrate is of opinion that any crop or other produce of the property, the subject of dispute in a proceeding under this section pending before him, is subject to speedy and natural decay, he may make an order for the proper custody or sale of such property, and, upon the completion of the inquiry, shall make such order for the disposal of such property, or the sale-proceeds thereof, as he thinks fit.
(9) The Magistrate may, if he thinks fit, at any stage of the proceedings under this section, on the application of either party, issue a summons to any witness directing him to attend or to produce any document or thing.
(10) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to be in derogation of powers of the Magistrate to proceed under section 107.
Source: Section 145, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 145 CrPC in Simple Words
Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides a procedure to prevent a breach of the peace caused by a dispute over land or water, including buildings, markets, fisheries, crops, and rents or profits. An Executive Magistrate does not decide the merits or claims of any party to a right to possess the property.
Instead, the Magistrate inquires into who held actual possession on the date of the initial written order, or who was forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed within two months next before the police report or other information was received, or after that and before the order. The Magistrate then declares or restores that party's possession and forbids all disturbance until eviction in due course of law.
When Section 145 CrPC Applies
- An Executive Magistrate shall make a written order stating the grounds of satisfaction under Section 145(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 whenever satisfied from a police officer's report or other information that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any land or water or its boundaries within local jurisdiction, requiring the concerned parties to attend Court in person or by pleader and put in written statements of their claims regarding actual possession.
- The Magistrate shall peruse the written statements put in, hear the parties, receive all evidence they produce, take any further evidence considered necessary, and if possible decide which party was in possession on the date of the order under Section 145(1) CrPC without referring to the merits or claims of any party to a right to possess the subject of dispute.
- Any party required to attend or any other interested person may show under Section 145(5) CrPC that no such dispute exists or has existed, in which case the Magistrate shall cancel the initial order and stay all further proceedings, though subject to such cancellation the order under Section 145(1) CrPC shall be final.
- If the Magistrate decides under Section 145(6)(a) CrPC that one of the parties was in possession, or should under the proviso to Section 145(4) CrPC be treated as being in possession, the Magistrate shall issue an order declaring that party entitled to possession and forbidding all disturbance, and may restore possession to a party forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed.
- During proceedings under Section 145 CrPC, the Magistrate may make the legal representative or all persons claiming to be representatives of a deceased party parties to the inquiry under Section 145(7) CrPC, may order proper custody or sale and disposal of crops or produce subject to speedy and natural decay under Section 145(8) CrPC, may summon witnesses or documents on either party's application under Section 145(9) CrPC, and retains powers to proceed under Section 107 CrPC as saved by Section 145(10) CrPC.
Time Limits Under Section 145 CrPC
- The initial written order made under Section 145(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 sets a specified date and time on which the parties concerned in the dispute must attend the Executive Magistrate's Court in person or by pleader and put in written statements of their claims as respects the fact of actual possession.Act text: βto attend his Court in person or by pleader, on a specified date and timeβ
- Under the proviso to Section 145(4) CrPC, the period within which a forcible and wrongful dispossession must have occurred for the Magistrate to treat the dispossessed party as having been in possession on the initial order date is within two months next before the date on which the report of a police officer or other information was received by the Magistrate, or after that date and before the date of the order under Section 145(1) CrPC.Act text: βforcibly and wrongfully dispossessed within two months next before the date on which the report of a police officer or other information was receivedβ
- An order issued under Section 145(6)(a) CrPC declaring a party entitled to possession of the subject of dispute and forbidding all disturbance of such possession remains in force until that party is evicted therefrom in due course of law.Act text: βentitled to possession thereof until evicted therefrom in due course of law, and forbidding all disturbance of such possession until such evictionβ
Example of Section 145 CrPC
When Section 145 CrPC Does Not Apply
- Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 does not apply where no dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists or has existed concerning any land or water or the boundaries of that land or water within the Executive Magistrate's local jurisdiction, and under Section 145(5) CrPC the Magistrate shall cancel the order and stay all further proceedings when this is shown.
- An inquiry under Section 145(4) CrPC does not apply to deciding the merits or the claims of any of the parties to a right to possess the subject of dispute, as the Magistrate must determine actual possession without reference to such merits or claims.
- Treating a dispossessed party as being in possession on the date of the order under Section 145(1) CrPC and restoring possession under Section 145(6)(a) CrPC do not apply where the party was not forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed within two months next before the date on which the police officer's report or other information was received by the Magistrate, or after that date and before the date of the order under Section 145(1) CrPC.
Section 145 CrPC Under BNSS 164: What Changed
Section 145 CrPC is now covered under Section 164 BNSS.
Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 became Section 164 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024 with no new or merged sub-sections. Section 164(1) BNSS replaces pleader with an advocate. The other changes are of form. Section 164(3) BNSS replaces Code with Sanhita and a summons with summons. Section 164(4) BNSS drops the word then. Section 164(6)(a) BNSS expands the said subject to the said subject of dispute and ends with a semicolon before Section 164(6)(b) BNSS. Section 164(10) BNSS updates the cross-reference from Section 107 CrPC to Section 126 BNSS. All other rules are unchanged.
View detailed comparison (CrPC 145 vs BNSS 164) βFAQs on Section 145 CrPC
What does the expression land or water include under Section 145 CrPC?βΌ
Section 145(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that the expression land or water includes buildings, markets, fisheries, crops or other produce of land, and the rents or profits of any such property. Under Section 145(1) CrPC, an Executive Magistrate can initiate proceedings whenever a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any such land or water or its boundaries within the Magistrate's local jurisdiction.
How must an order under Section 145 CrPC be served and published?βΌ
Section 145(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 requires a copy of the initial order to be served in the manner provided by the Code for the service of a summons upon such person or persons as the Magistrate may direct. At least one copy shall also be published by being affixed to some conspicuous place at or near the subject of dispute, and Section 145(6)(b) CrPC requires the final order to be served and published in the same manner.
What if a party was forcibly dispossessed before the Magistrate's initial order under Section 145 CrPC?βΌ
The proviso to Section 145(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 relaxes the requirement of possession on the initial order date. If it appears to the Magistrate that any party was forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed within two months next before the date on which the police report or other information was received, or after that date and before the order under Section 145(1) CrPC, the Magistrate may treat that party as in possession on the order date and restore possession under Section 145(6)(a) CrPC.
How does Section 145 CrPC deal with perishable produce or the death of a party?βΌ
Under Section 145(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if the Magistrate is of opinion that any crop or other produce of the disputed property is subject to speedy and natural decay, the Magistrate may order its proper custody or sale and, upon completion of the inquiry, order disposal of the property or sale-proceeds as thought fit. Under Section 145(7) CrPC, when a party dies, the Magistrate may make the legal representative or all persons claiming to be representatives parties and continue the inquiry.
Which provision replaced Section 145 CrPC from 1 July 2024?βΌ
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. Under the official mapping, Section 145 CrPC corresponds to Section 164 of the Sanhita, which carries forward the procedure for disputes concerning land or water likely to cause a breach of the peace.
Have questions about Section 145 CrPC?
Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.
Ask NyayGuru βDisclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Β· Last updated: 26 Oct 2026 Β·