Section 211 CrPC: Contents of charge
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 211 CrPC at a Glance
Section 211 CrPC deals with contents of charge. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 234 BNSS.
What Section 211 CrPC Says
211. Contents of charge
(1) Every charge under this Code shall state the offence with which the accused is charged.
(2) If the law which creates the offence gives it any specific name, the offence may be described in the charge by that name only.
(3) If the law which creates the offence does not give it any specific name, so much of the definition of the offence must be stated as to give the accused notice of the matter with which he is charged.
(4) The law and section of the law against which the offence is said to have been committed shall be mentioned in the charge.
(5) The fact that the charge is made is equivalent to a statement that every legal condition required by law to constitute the offence charged was fulfilled in the particular case.
(6) The charge shall be written in the language of the Court.
(7) If the accused, having been previously convicted of any offence, is liable, by reason of such previous conviction, to enhanced punishment, or to punishment of a different kind, for a subsequent offence, and it is intended to prove such previous conviction for the purpose of affecting the punishment which the Court may think fit to award for the subsequent offence, the fact, date and place of the previous conviction shall be stated in the charge; and if such statement has been omitted, the Court may add it at any time before sentence is passed.
Illustrations(a) A is charged with the murder of B. This is equivalent to a statement that A's act fell within the definition of murder given in sections 299 and 300 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860); that it did not fall within any of the general exceptions of the said Code; and that it did not fall within any of the five exceptions to section 300, or that, if it did fall within Exception 1, one or other of the three provisos to that exception applied to it.
(b) A is charged under section 326 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), with voluntarily causing grievous hurt to B by means of an instrument for shooting. This is equivalent to a statement that the case was not provided for by section 335 of the said Code, and that the general exceptions did not apply to it.
(c) A is accused of murder, cheating, theft, extortion, adultery or criminal intimidation, or using a false property-mark. The charge may state that A committed murder, or cheating, or theft, or extortion, or adultery, or criminal intimidation, or that he used a false property-mark, without reference to the definitions, of those crimes contained in the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860); but the sections under which the offence is punishable must, in each instance be referred to in the charge.
(d) A is charged under section 184 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) with intentionally obstructing a sale of property offered for sale by the lawful authority of a public servant. The charge should be in those words.
Source: Section 211, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 211 CrPC in Simple Words
Section 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 governs the contents of a charge so that an accused person has notice of the matter with which he is charged. Every charge under the Code shall state the offence, mention the law and section against which the offence is said to have been committed, and be written in the language of the Court.
It sets out when an offence may be described by its specific name alone and when part of its definition must be stated. It also treats the charge as a statement that every required legal condition was fulfilled.
When Section 211 CrPC Applies
- Every charge framed against an accused under Section 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall state the offence, mention the law and section under which it was allegedly committed, and be written in the language of the Court.
- Where the statute creating an offence gives it a specific name, the charge may identify the offence using that name alone without setting out its statutory definition, as provided in Section 211(2) CrPC.
- When the law creating an offence does not assign it a specific name, Section 211(3) CrPC requires that enough of the offence definition must be stated in the charge to give the accused notice of the accusation.
- Making a charge against an accused operates under Section 211(5) CrPC as an implied statement that every legal condition required by law to constitute that offence was satisfied in the case, including the absence of applicable exceptions.
- Where a previously convicted accused is liable to enhanced punishment or punishment of a different kind for a subsequent offence and that conviction is intended to be proved to affect the punishment the Court may think fit to award, the fact, date, and place of the previous conviction shall be stated in the charge under Section 211(7) CrPC.
Time Limits Under Section 211 CrPC
- If the required statement of the fact, date, and place of a previous conviction has been omitted from the charge, the Court may add it under Section 211(7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 at any time before sentence is passed.Act text: โthe Court may add it at any time before sentence is passedโ
Example of Section 211 CrPC
When Section 211 CrPC Does Not Apply
- The permission in Section 211(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to describe an offence in the charge by its specific name alone does not apply when the law creating the offence does not give it any specific name.
- The requirement in Section 211(3) CrPC to state part of the definition of the offence in the charge does not apply when the law creating the offence gives it a specific name.
- The duty under Section 211(7) CrPC to state the fact, date, and place of a previous conviction in the charge does not apply if the accused is not liable, by reason of such previous conviction, to enhanced punishment or punishment of a different kind for the subsequent offence.
- Even where an accused has a previous conviction, the requirement under Section 211(7) CrPC to state that conviction in the charge does not apply if it is not intended to prove such previous conviction for the purpose of affecting the punishment which the Court may think fit to award.
Section 211 CrPC Under BNSS 234: What Changed
Section 211 CrPC is now covered under Section 234 BNSS.
Section 211 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is renumbered as Section 234 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The rules in Section 211(1) CrPC to Section 211(7) CrPC and Section 234(1) BNSS to Section 234(7) BNSS governing the contents of a charge are unchanged, and replacing the word Code with Sanhita in Section 234(1) BNSS is a change of form. In the illustrations, updating references from Sections 299, 300, 326, 335, and 184 of the Indian Penal Code to Sections 100, 101, 118(2), 122(2), and 219 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is a change of form, while the third illustration omits adultery, which is not an offence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
View detailed comparison (CrPC 211 vs BNSS 234) โFAQs on Section 211 CrPC
When must a charge state the definition of the offence under Section 211 CrPC?โผ
A charge must state part of the offence definition when the law creating the offence does not give it any specific name. Section 211(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that so much of the definition must be stated as to give the accused notice of the matter charged. Where the law gives a specific name, Section 211(2) CrPC allows describing the offence by that name only.
What does the framing of a charge imply about legal conditions and exceptions under Section 211 CrPC?โผ
Making a charge has the legal effect stated in Section 211(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It is equivalent to a statement that every legal condition required by law to constitute the offence charged was fulfilled in the particular case. As the illustrations to Section 211 CrPC show, this means the charge implies that general exceptions and statutory exceptions did not apply to the case.
When must a previous conviction be stated in the charge under Section 211 CrPC, and can an omission be corrected?โผ
The fact, date, and place of a previous conviction shall be stated in the charge under Section 211(7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 when the accused is liable because of it to enhanced punishment or punishment of a different kind for a subsequent offence, and it is intended to prove that conviction to affect the punishment awarded. If omitted, the Court may add it at any time before sentence is passed.
Where is Section 211 CrPC found in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?โผ
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. From 1 July 2024, the provision on the contents of a charge is found in Section 234 BNSS, with Section 211(1) through Section 211(7) CrPC mapping directly to Section 234(1) through Section 234(7) BNSS.
Have questions about Section 211 CrPC?
Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.
Ask NyayGuru โDisclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ยท Last updated: 22 Oct 2026 ยท