Section 66B IT Act: Punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen computer resource or communication device

Information Technology Act, 2000

Section 66B IT Act at a Glance

Section 66B IT Act punishes dishonestly receiving or retaining a stolen computer resource or communication device, knowing or having reason to believe it is stolen. Punishment is up to 3 years imprisonment, a fine up to ₹1 lakh instead of imprisonment, or both.

Punishment

Up to 3 years, simple or rigorous

Bailable ⓘCognizable ⓘCompoundable ⓘ🏛️ Magistrate of the first class ⓘ

Section 66B IT Act Bare Act Text

66B. Punishment for dishonestly receiving stolen computer resource or communication device.

Whoever dishonestly received or retains any stolen computer resource or communication device knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen computer resource or communication device, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years or with fine which may extend to rupees one lakh or with both.

Amendments to this section
  • Subs. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 32, for sections 66 and 67 (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).

Section 66B IT Act in Simple Words

Section 66B IT Act makes it an offence to dishonestly receive or retain any stolen computer resource or communication device. Either dishonestly receiving the stolen item or dishonestly keeping possession of it (retaining it) attracts Section 66B IT Act when the mental conditions of the offence are met.

Two mental requirements must exist under Section 66B IT Act. First, the person must act dishonestly when receiving or retaining the computer resource or communication device. Second, the person must either know that the computer resource or communication device is stolen or have reason to believe that it is stolen.

A person convicted under Section 66B IT Act faces simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years, a fine of up to ₹1 lakh instead of imprisonment, or both. Under Section 77B IT Act, the offence is cognizable, meaning the police can register an FIR and arrest without a warrant, and bailable, meaning the arrested person has a right to be released on bail. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), a Magistrate of the first class tries the case. Under Section 77A IT Act, a court may compound the offence, meaning allow it to be settled, except where the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, where the offence affects the socio-economic conditions of the country, or where it was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.

Ingredients of Section 66B IT Act

  • The property involved is a stolen computer resource or stolen communication device.
  • The accused receives or retains that computer resource or communication device.
  • The accused acts dishonestly in receiving or retaining it.
  • The accused knows or has reason to believe that the computer resource or communication device is stolen.

Punishment Under Section 66B IT Act

Imprisonment

Up to 3 years, simple or rigorous

Fine

Up to ₹1 lakh, instead of or with imprisonment

Bailable ⓘCognizable ⓘCompoundable ⓘ🏛️ Magistrate of the first class ⓘ

Section 77B IT Act makes an offence punishable with imprisonment of 3 years cognizable and bailable. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the BNSS it is tried by a Magistrate of the first class. Section 77A IT Act lets the court compound it, but not where the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or where the offence affects the socio economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.

An offence under Section 66B IT Act is punishable with simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years, a fine of up to ₹1 lakh instead of imprisonment, or both. It is cognizable, bailable, and triable by a Magistrate of the first class. Under Section 77A IT Act, the court may compound the offence, except where the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or where the offence affects the socio-economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.

Example of Section 66B IT Act

Girish steals a laptop from an office in Itanagar and offers to sell it to Dhruv. Girish tells Dhruv that the laptop was taken without permission from the office, and Dhruv buys and keeps the laptop to gain a wrongful advantage at a low price. Because the laptop is a stolen computer resource and Dhruv dishonestly receives and retains it knowing it to be stolen, Dhruv commits an offence under Section 66B IT Act. On conviction, Dhruv faces simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years, a fine of up to ₹1 lakh instead of imprisonment, or both.

When Section 66B IT Act Does Not Apply

  • Where the computer resource or communication device received or retained is not stolen.
  • Where the person receiving or retaining the stolen computer resource or communication device does not act dishonestly.
  • Where the person neither knows nor has reason to believe that the computer resource or communication device is stolen.

FAQs on Section 66B IT Act

What is Section 66B IT Act?▼

Section 66B IT Act punishes anyone who dishonestly receives or retains a stolen computer resource or communication device while knowing or having reason to believe that it is stolen. The offence carries simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years, a fine of up to ₹1 lakh instead of imprisonment, or both.

Is an offence under Section 66B IT Act bailable and cognizable?▼

Yes. Under Section 77B IT Act, an offence under Section 66B IT Act is both cognizable and bailable, so the police can register an FIR without a warrant and the arrested person has a right to bail.

Is imprisonment mandatory on conviction under Section 66B IT Act?▼

No. Section 66B IT Act lets the court impose simple or rigorous imprisonment of up to 3 years, a fine of up to ₹1 lakh instead of imprisonment, or both.

Can an offence under Section 66B IT Act be compounded?▼

Yes. Under Section 77A IT Act, the court may compound the offence unless the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or the offence affects the socio-economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.

Which court tries a case under Section 66B IT Act?▼

A Magistrate of the first class. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the BNSS, offences under Section 66B IT Act are tried by a Magistrate of the first class.

Have questions about Section 66B IT Act?

Ask NyayGuru about your situation and get an answer based on the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Ask NyayGuru →

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Information Technology Act, 2000 ·