Section 66D IT Act: Punishment for cheating by personation by using computer resource
Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 66D IT Act at a Glance
Section 66D IT Act punishes anyone who cheats by personating through a communication device or computer resource. A convicted offender faces simple or rigorous imprisonment up to 3 years and is also liable to a fine up to ₹1 lakh.
Up to 3 years, simple or rigorous
Section 66D IT Act Bare Act Text
66D. Punishment for cheating by personation by using computer resource.
Whoever, by means of any communication device or computer resource cheats by personating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to one lakh rupees.
Amendments to this section
- Subs. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 32, for sections 66 and 67 (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).
Section 66D IT Act in Simple Words
Section 66D IT Act punishes cheating by personating, meaning cheating by pretending to be another person, when carried out through any communication device or computer resource. Cheating by personation is defined in Section 319 BNS (formerly Section 416 of the Indian Penal Code).
For Section 66D IT Act to apply, two requirements must be met: the offender cheats by personating, and the offender uses a communication device or a computer resource as the means to commit that cheating. While Section 66C IT Act punishes the fraudulent or dishonest use of another person's password, electronic signature, or unique identification feature, Section 66D IT Act punishes using a computer resource or communication device to cheat by personating.
Conviction under Section 66D IT Act carries simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years, and the offender is also liable to a fine of up to ₹1 lakh in addition to imprisonment. Under Section 77B IT Act, the offence is cognizable, so police can register an FIR and arrest without a warrant, and bailable, so the accused can claim bail as of right. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), a Magistrate of the first class tries the offence. Under Section 77A IT Act, the court may compound (settle) the case, except where the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or where the offence affects the socio-economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.
Ingredients of Section 66D IT Act
- The accused cheats by personating.
- The cheating by personating is carried out by means of a communication device or a computer resource.
Punishment Under Section 66D IT Act
Up to 3 years, simple or rigorous
Liable to fine of up to ₹1 lakh, in addition to imprisonment
Section 77B IT Act makes an offence punishable with imprisonment of 3 years cognizable and bailable. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the BNSS it is tried by a Magistrate of the first class. Section 77A IT Act lets the court compound it, but not where the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or where the offence affects the socio economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.
An offence under Section 66D IT Act carries simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years, and the offender is also liable to a fine of up to ₹1 lakh in addition to imprisonment. It is cognizable, bailable, and triable by a Magistrate of the first class. Under Section 77A IT Act, the court may compound the offence unless the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or the offence affects the socio-economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.
Example of Section 66D IT Act
When Section 66D IT Act Does Not Apply
- Where no communication device or computer resource is used as the means to cheat by personating.
- Where a communication device or computer resource is used, without the conduct amounting to cheating by personating.
FAQs on Section 66D IT Act
What is Section 66D IT Act?▼
Section 66D IT Act punishes anyone who cheats by personating by means of any communication device or computer resource. A convicted person faces simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years and is also liable to a fine of up to ₹1 lakh.
Is cheating by personation under Section 66D IT Act bailable?▼
Yes. Under Section 77B IT Act, an offence under Section 66D IT Act is both cognizable and bailable, so an arrested person can obtain bail as of right.
Can the court impose only a fine instead of imprisonment under Section 66D IT Act?▼
No. Section 66D IT Act prescribes simple or rigorous imprisonment for up to 3 years and makes the offender liable to a fine of up to ₹1 lakh in addition to imprisonment, not in place of imprisonment.
Can an offence under Section 66D IT Act be compounded?▼
Yes. Under Section 77A IT Act, the court may compound the offence, except where the accused is liable to enhanced punishment because of a previous conviction, or where the offence affects the socio-economic conditions of the country or was committed against a child below 18 years or a woman.
Which court tries a case under Section 66D IT Act?▼
A Magistrate of the first class. Under Part II of the First Schedule to the BNSS, an offence under Section 66D IT Act is tried by a Magistrate of the first class.
Have questions about Section 66D IT Act?
Ask NyayGuru about your situation and get an answer based on the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Ask NyayGuru →Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Information Technology Act, 2000 ·