CrPC 133 to BNSS 152: Conditional order for removal of nuisance
Section 133 CrPC (1973) replaced by Section 152 BNSS (2023)
CrPC 133 to BNSS 152 at a Glance
Section 133 CrPC (Conditional order for removal of nuisance) is now Section 152 BNSS, in force from 1 July 2024. What changed is set out below.
What Changed From CrPC 133 to BNSS 152?
From 1 July 2024, Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is replaced by Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with Section 133(2) CrPC becoming Section 152(2) BNSS. This transition is purely a change of form consisting of section renumbering. The substantive rule and the statutory wording are completely unchanged. The Magistrates empowered to act, the grounds for issuing a conditional order, the remedial directions, the right of an objecting person to appear and show cause, the bar on Civil Court challenges, and the Explanation of a public place remain identical.
CrPC 133 vs BNSS 152: Comparison Table
| Aspect | CrPC 1973 (repealed) | BNSS 2023 (in force) |
|---|---|---|
| Section | 133 | 152 |
| Heading | Conditional order for removal of nuisance | Same |
| Sub-sections | 2 sub-sections | Same |
CrPC 133 and BNSS 152: Bare Act Text Side by Side
Section 133, CrPC 1973
Section 152, BNSS 2023
When It Applies: CrPC 133 vs BNSS 152
- A District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or another Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government may act upon receiving a police officer report or other information and after taking any evidence that the Magistrate thinks fit.
- The Magistrate may make a conditional order against a person causing an unlawful obstruction or nuisance in a public place, way, river, or channel lawfully used by the public, including State property, camping grounds, and unoccupied sanitary or recreative grounds, or against a person conducting a trade or occupation or keeping goods or merchandise that is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community.
- The Magistrate may issue a conditional order to the owner, possessor, or controller when the construction of a building or the disposal of a substance is likely to occasion conflagration or explosion, or when a building, tent, structure, or tree is in a condition likely to fall and cause injury to people living or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing by.
- The Magistrate may also issue a conditional order to the person owning, possessing, or controlling a tank, well, or excavation adjacent to a public way or public place so that it is fenced to prevent public danger, or to the owner or possessor of a dangerous animal requiring that it be destroyed, confined, or otherwise disposed of.
- If the person directed by the conditional order objects to performing the required action, the order requires that person to appear before the issuing Magistrate or a subordinate Executive Magistrate and show cause why the conditional order should not be made absolute.
- Under Section 133(2) CrPC, once a Magistrate has duly made an order under Section 133 CrPC, no Civil Court shall entertain any challenge calling that order into question.
- A District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or another Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government may initiate proceedings on receiving a police officer report or other information and after taking such evidence as the Magistrate thinks fit.
- The Magistrate may make a conditional order against a person causing an unlawful obstruction or nuisance in any public place, including State property, camping grounds, and unoccupied sanitary or recreative grounds, or in any way, river, or channel lawfully used by the public, or against a person conducting a trade or occupation or keeping goods or merchandise that is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community.
- The Magistrate may issue a conditional order to the person owning, possessing, or controlling a building or substance when building construction or substance disposal is likely to occasion conflagration or explosion, or when a building, tent, structure, or tree is in a condition likely to fall and cause injury to persons living or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing by.
- The Magistrate may also issue a conditional order to the owner, possessor, or controller of a tank, well, or excavation adjacent to a public way or public place requiring it to be fenced to prevent public danger, or to the owner or possessor of a dangerous animal requiring it to be destroyed, confined, or otherwise disposed of.
- If the person against whom the conditional order is made objects to carrying out the directed action, the order requires that person to appear before the issuing Magistrate or a subordinate Executive Magistrate to show cause why the order should not be made absolute.
- Under Section 152(2) BNSS, no order that has been duly made by a Magistrate under Section 152 BNSS shall be called in question in any Civil Court.
Time Limits: CrPC 133 to BNSS 152
- A conditional order under Section 133(1) CrPC requires the person to carry out the directed removal, regulation, repair, support, fencing, or disposal within a time fixed in the order.Act text: “within a time to be fixed in the order”
- A person who objects to complying with the conditional order must appear to show cause why the order should not be made absolute at a time and place fixed by the order.Act text: “at a time and place to be fixed by the order”
- A conditional order under Section 152(1) BNSS requires the person to perform the directed removal, regulation, repair, support, fencing, or disposal within a time fixed in the order.Act text: “within a time to be fixed in the order”
- A person who objects to performing the action required by the conditional order must appear to show cause why the order should not be made absolute at a time and place fixed by the order.Act text: “at a time and place to be fixed by the order”
What CrPC 133 to BNSS 152 Means in Practice
FAQs: CrPC 133 to BNSS 152
What is the new section number for Section 133 CrPC in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?▼
From 1 July 2024, Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is replaced by Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and Section 133(2) CrPC corresponds to Section 152(2) BNSS. This change is purely a change of form through renumbering, and the entire statutory text governing conditional orders for the removal of public nuisances remains unchanged.
Did Section 152 BNSS change the powers of Executive Magistrates or the grounds for a conditional order compared to Section 133 CrPC?▼
No, the powers of a District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or an Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government remain unchanged between Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. All categories of public obstructions, nuisances, injurious trades or goods, fire or explosion risks, dangerous buildings or trees, unfenced tanks or wells, and dangerous animals are identical.
Did the bar on Civil Court jurisdiction or the definition of a public place change between Section 133 CrPC and Section 152 BNSS?▼
No, both provisions are unchanged. Section 152(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 retains the exact rule from Section 133(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 that no order duly made by a Magistrate shall be called in question in any Civil Court. The Explanation stating that a public place includes property belonging to the State, camping grounds, and grounds left unoccupied for sanitary or recreative purposes is also unchanged.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 22 Oct 2026 ·