Section 133 CrPC: Conditional order for removal of nuisance

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 133 CrPC at a Glance

Section 133 CrPC deals with conditional order for removal of nuisance. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 152 BNSS.

What Section 133 CrPC Says

133. Conditional order for removal of nuisance

(1) Whenever a District Magistrate or a Sub-divisional Magistrate or any other Executive Magistrate specially empowered in this behalf by the State Government, on receiving the report of a police officer or other information and on taking such evidence (if any) as he thinks fit, considers—

(a) that any unlawful obstruction or nuisance should be removed from any public place or from any way, river or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public; or

(b) that the conduct of any trade or occupation, or the keeping of any goods or merchandise, is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community, and that in consequence such trade or occupation should be prohibited or regulated or such goods or merchandise should be removed or the keeping thereof regulated; or

(c) that the construction of any building, or, the disposal of any substance, as is likely to occasion conflagration or explosion, should be prevented or stopped; or

(d) that any building, tent or structure, or any tree is in such a condition that it is likely to fall and thereby cause injury to persons living or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing by, and that in consequence the removal, repair or support of such building, tent or structure, or the removal or support of such tree, is necessary; or

(e) that any tank, well or excavation adjacent to any such way or public place should be fenced in such manner as to prevent danger arising to the public; or

(f) that any dangerous animal should be destroyed, confined or otherwise disposed of, such Magistrate may make a conditional order requiring the person causing such obstruction or nuisance, or carrying on such trade or occupation, or keeping any such goods or merchandise, or owning, possessing or controlling such building, tent, structure, substance, tank, well or excavation, or owning or possessing such animal or tree, within a time to be fixed in the order—

(i) to remove such obstruction or nuisance; or

(ii) to desist from carrying on, or to remove or regulate in such manner as may be directed, such trade or occupation, or to remove such goods or merchandise, or to regulate the keeping thereof in such manner as may be directed; or

(iii) to prevent or stop the construction of such building, or to alter the disposal of such substance; or

(iv) to remove, repair or support such building, tent or structure, or to remove or support such trees; or

(v) to fence such tank, well or excavation; or

(vi) to destroy, confine or dispose of such dangerous animal in the manner provided in the said order, or, if he objects so to do, to appear before himself or some other Executive Magistrate subordinate to him at a time and place to be fixed by the order, and show cause, in the manner hereinafter provided, why the order should not be made absolute.

(2) No order duly made by a Magistrate under this section shall be called in question in any Civil Court.

Explanation

A “public place” includes also property belonging to the State, camping grounds and grounds left unoccupied for sanitary or recreative purposes.

Source: Section 133, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 133 CrPC in Simple Words

Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 gives a District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or an Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government the power to address public obstructions, nuisances, and hazards to public safety or community health.

Acting on a police report or other information and taking such evidence as he thinks fit, the Magistrate may make a conditional order requiring the responsible person to remove or remedy the hazard within a fixed time, or else appear to show cause why the order should not be made absolute.

Under Section 133(2) CrPC, no order duly made shall be called in question in any Civil Court.

When Section 133 CrPC Applies

  • A District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or another Executive Magistrate specially empowered by the State Government may act upon receiving a police officer report or other information and after taking any evidence that the Magistrate thinks fit.
  • The Magistrate may make a conditional order against a person causing an unlawful obstruction or nuisance in a public place, way, river, or channel lawfully used by the public, including State property, camping grounds, and unoccupied sanitary or recreative grounds, or against a person conducting a trade or occupation or keeping goods or merchandise that is injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community.
  • The Magistrate may issue a conditional order to the owner, possessor, or controller when the construction of a building or the disposal of a substance is likely to occasion conflagration or explosion, or when a building, tent, structure, or tree is in a condition likely to fall and cause injury to people living or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing by.
  • The Magistrate may also issue a conditional order to the person owning, possessing, or controlling a tank, well, or excavation adjacent to a public way or public place so that it is fenced to prevent public danger, or to the owner or possessor of a dangerous animal requiring that it be destroyed, confined, or otherwise disposed of.
  • If the person directed by the conditional order objects to performing the required action, the order requires that person to appear before the issuing Magistrate or a subordinate Executive Magistrate and show cause why the conditional order should not be made absolute.
  • Under Section 133(2) CrPC, once a Magistrate has duly made an order under Section 133 CrPC, no Civil Court shall entertain any challenge calling that order into question.

Time Limits Under Section 133 CrPC

  • A conditional order under Section 133(1) CrPC requires the person to carry out the directed removal, regulation, repair, support, fencing, or disposal within a time fixed in the order.Act text: “within a time to be fixed in the order”
  • A person who objects to complying with the conditional order must appear to show cause why the order should not be made absolute at a time and place fixed by the order.Act text: “at a time and place to be fixed by the order”

Example of Section 133 CrPC

Ramesh owns a building in Jaipur. A police officer reports that the building is in such a condition that it is likely to fall and thereby cause injury to persons living or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing by. Under Section 133(1)(d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Sub-divisional Magistrate takes such evidence as he thinks fit and considers that repairing the building is necessary. The Magistrate makes a conditional order under Section 133(1)(iv) CrPC requiring Ramesh to repair the building within a fixed time, or, if he objects, to appear at a fixed time and place and show cause why the order should not be made absolute.

When Section 133 CrPC Does Not Apply

  • An Executive Magistrate who is neither a District Magistrate nor a Sub-divisional Magistrate and has not been specially empowered in this behalf by the State Government cannot make a conditional order under Section 133(1) CrPC.
  • Section 133(1)(a) CrPC does not apply to an obstruction or nuisance unless it is in a public place or in a way, river, or channel that is or may be lawfully used by the public.
  • Section 133(1)(b) CrPC does not authorize prohibiting or regulating a trade, occupation, or the keeping of goods or merchandise when it is not injurious to the health or physical comfort of the community.
  • Section 133(1)(d) CrPC does not apply to a building, tent, structure, or tree that is not in a condition where it is likely to fall and thereby cause injury to persons living or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing by.

Section 133 CrPC Under BNSS 152: What Changed

Section 133 CrPC is now covered under Section 152 BNSS.

From 1 July 2024, Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is replaced by Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with Section 133(2) CrPC becoming Section 152(2) BNSS. This transition is purely a change of form consisting of section renumbering. The substantive rule and the statutory wording are completely unchanged. The Magistrates empowered to act, the grounds for issuing a conditional order, the remedial directions, the right of an objecting person to appear and show cause, the bar on Civil Court challenges, and the Explanation of a public place remain identical.

View detailed comparison (CrPC 133 vs BNSS 152) →

FAQs on Section 133 CrPC

Which Magistrates can issue a conditional order for the removal of a nuisance under Section 133 CrPC?▼

A District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate, or any other Executive Magistrate specially empowered in this behalf by the State Government may issue a conditional order under Section 133(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The Magistrate may act on receiving the report of a police officer or other information, and after taking such evidence, if any, as the Magistrate thinks fit before making the conditional order.

What counts as a public place under Section 133 CrPC?▼

The Explanation to Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 clarifies that a public place includes property belonging to the State, camping grounds, and grounds left unoccupied for sanitary or recreative purposes. In addition, Section 133(1)(a) CrPC covers any unlawful obstruction or nuisance in any public place or in any way, river, or channel which is or may be lawfully used by the public.

What can a person do if they object to a conditional order made under Section 133 CrPC?▼

A person who receives a conditional order under Section 133(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 must either carry out the required remedial action within the time fixed in the order or, if they object so to do, appear before the issuing Magistrate or another Executive Magistrate subordinate to that Magistrate. They must appear at the time and place fixed by the order and show cause why the conditional order should not be made absolute.

Can an order made by a Magistrate under Section 133 CrPC be challenged in a Civil Court?▼

No order duly made by a Magistrate under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 shall be called in question in any Civil Court, as stated in Section 133(2) CrPC. A person who objects to complying with the directions in the conditional order may appear before the Magistrate or a subordinate Executive Magistrate at the fixed time and place to show cause.

Which provision of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 replaced Section 133 CrPC?▼

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. From 1 July 2024, Section 133 CrPC corresponds to Section 152 BNSS, and Section 133(2) CrPC corresponds to Section 152(2) BNSS. Section 152 BNSS retains the title Conditional order for removal of nuisance and carries forward the provisions on conditional orders by Executive Magistrates and the bar on questioning duly made orders in any Civil Court.

Have questions about Section 133 CrPC?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru →

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Last updated: 22 Oct 2026 ·