CrPC 162→BNSS 181

CrPC 162 to BNSS 181: Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence

Section 162 CrPC (1973) replaced by Section 181 BNSS (2023)

View CrPC Section 162 →View BNSS Section 181 →

CrPC 162 to BNSS 181 at a Glance

Section 162 CrPC (Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence) is now Section 181 BNSS, in force from 1 July 2024. What changed is set out below.

What Changed From CrPC 162 to BNSS 181?

Section 181 BNSS has the heading Statements to police and use thereof, where Section 162 CrPC has the heading Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence. The proviso to Section 181(1) BNSS refers to section 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where the proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC referred to section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 181(2) BNSS refers to section 26(a) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where Section 162(2) CrPC referred to section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and refers to the proviso to section 23(2) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where Section 162(2) CrPC referred to section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The rest of the text, including the Explanation, is the same.

CrPC 162 vs BNSS 181: Comparison Table

AspectCrPC 1973 (repealed)BNSS 2023 (in force)
Section162181
HeadingStatements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidenceStatements to police and use thereof
Sub-sections2 sub-sectionsSame

CrPC 162 and BNSS 181: Bare Act Text Side by Side

CrPC 1973 (repealed)

Section 162, CrPC 1973

162. Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence.—(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made: Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination. (2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); or to affect the provisions of section 27 of that Act. Explanation.—An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.
BNSS 2023 (in force)

Section 181, BNSS 2023

181. Statements to police and use thereof.—(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made: Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination. (2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (a) of section 26 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023; or to affect the provisions of the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 23 of that Adhiniyam. Explanation.—An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

When It Applies: CrPC 162 vs BNSS 181

Under CrPC 162
  1. A statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under Chapter XII of the Code shall not be signed by the person making it, if it is reduced to writing.
  2. No such statement or any record of the statement, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of the statement or record, shall be used for any purpose at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when the statement was made, except as the proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC and Section 162(2) CrPC allow.
  3. When a witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial and the statement of the witness was reduced to writing in the course of the investigation, any part of the statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict the witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
  4. When any part of such statement is so used, any part of the statement may also be used in the re-examination of the witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in the cross-examination of the witness.
  5. An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in Section 162(1) CrPC may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs. Whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.
Under BNSS 181
  1. A statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under Chapter XIII of the Sanhita shall not be signed by the person making it, if it is reduced to writing.
  2. No such statement or any record of the statement, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of the statement or record, shall be used for any purpose at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when the statement was made, except as the proviso to Section 181(1) BNSS and Section 181(2) BNSS allow.
  3. When a witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial and the statement of the witness was reduced to writing in the course of the investigation, any part of the statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict the witness in the manner provided by section 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.
  4. When any part of such statement is so used, any part of the statement may also be used in the re-examination of the witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in the cross-examination of the witness.
  5. An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in Section 181(1) BNSS may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs. Whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

What CrPC 162 to BNSS 181 Means in Practice

From 1 July 2024, the text on statements to police is read in Section 181 BNSS in place of Section 162 CrPC. The cross references in Section 181 BNSS are to the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

FAQs: CrPC 162 to BNSS 181

Which Act does Section 181 BNSS refer to for contradicting a witness?▼

The proviso to Section 181(1) BNSS refers to section 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. The proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC referred to section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

What do the cross references in Section 181(2) BNSS read compared with Section 162(2) CrPC?▼

Section 181(2) BNSS refers to section 26(a) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and to the proviso to section 23(2) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. Section 162(2) CrPC referred to section 32(1) and section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Does the Explanation read differently in Section 181 BNSS and Section 162 CrPC?▼

The Explanation to Section 181 BNSS has the same text as the Explanation to Section 162 CrPC.

Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 · Last updated: 26 Oct 2026 ·