Section 162 CrPC: Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 162 CrPC at a Glance

Section 162 CrPC deals with statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 181 BNSS.

Now BNSS

Section 181 →

What Section 162 CrPC Says

162. Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence

(1) No statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under this Chapter, shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it; nor shall any such statement or any record thereof, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of such statement or record, be used for any purpose, save as hereinafter provided, at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when such statement was made:

Provided that when any witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial whose statement has been reduced into writing as aforesaid, any part of his statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict such witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); and when any part of such statement is so used, any part thereof may also be used in the re-examination of such witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in his cross-examination.

(2) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of clause (1) of section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872); or to affect the provisions of section 27 of that Act.

Explanation

An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in sub-section (1) may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs and whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

Source: Section 162, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Section 162 CrPC in Simple Words

Section 162 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 deals with statements made by any person to a police officer during an investigation under Chapter XII of the Code. Such a statement shall not be signed by the person who made it if the police write it down. The statement shall not be used for any purpose at an inquiry or trial for an offence that was under investigation when the statement was made. The same bar covers any record of the statement, in a police diary or elsewhere, and any part of the statement or record.

The only exceptions are the proviso and Section 162(2) CrPC. Under the proviso, when a prosecution witness is called and the statement of the witness was written down, the accused may use any duly proved part of it to contradict the witness. The prosecution may do the same with the permission of the Court, and either side does so in the manner set out in section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Once a part is used that way, any part of the statement may also be used in re-examination, but only to explain a matter raised in cross-examination.

The section does not apply to a statement covered by section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and does not affect section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Under the Explanation, leaving a fact or circumstance out of the statement may amount to a contradiction if the omission appears significant and otherwise relevant in its context. Whether an omission amounts to a contradiction in a particular context is a question of fact.

When Section 162 CrPC Applies

  • A statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under Chapter XII of the Code shall not be signed by the person making it, if it is reduced to writing.
  • No such statement or any record of the statement, whether in a police diary or otherwise, or any part of the statement or record, shall be used for any purpose at any inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation at the time when the statement was made, except as the proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC and Section 162(2) CrPC allow.
  • When a witness is called for the prosecution in such inquiry or trial and the statement of the witness was reduced to writing in the course of the investigation, any part of the statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict the witness in the manner provided by section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
  • When any part of such statement is so used, any part of the statement may also be used in the re-examination of the witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in the cross-examination of the witness.
  • An omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in Section 162(1) CrPC may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs. Whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

Example of Section 162 CrPC

Sunita makes a statement to Inspector Ravi in the course of an investigation under Chapter XII of the Code, and the statement is reduced to writing. Under Section 162(1) CrPC, the statement shall not be signed by Sunita. Later Sunita is called as a witness for the prosecution at the trial. Any part of the statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused to contradict Sunita.

When Section 162 CrPC Does Not Apply

  • Section 162(2) CrPC provides that nothing in Section 162 CrPC shall be deemed to apply to any statement falling within the provisions of section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
  • Section 162(2) CrPC provides that nothing in Section 162 CrPC shall be deemed to affect the provisions of section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
  • Section 162(1) CrPC bars the use of a statement for any purpose, except as the proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC and Section 162(2) CrPC allow. Its proviso allows the use of a part of the statement of a witness called for the prosecution, if duly proved, by the accused to contradict such witness.

Section 162 CrPC Under BNSS 181: What Changed

Section 162 CrPC is now covered under Section 181 BNSS.

Section 181 BNSS has the heading Statements to police and use thereof, where Section 162 CrPC has the heading Statements to police not to be signed: Use of statements in evidence. The proviso to Section 181(1) BNSS refers to section 148 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where the proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC referred to section 145 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. Section 181(2) BNSS refers to section 26(a) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where Section 162(2) CrPC referred to section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and refers to the proviso to section 23(2) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, where Section 162(2) CrPC referred to section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The rest of the text, including the Explanation, is the same.

View detailed comparison (CrPC 162 vs BNSS 181) →

FAQs on Section 162 CrPC

May a statement made to a police officer be signed under Section 162 CrPC?▼

Section 162(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 provides that no statement made by any person to a police officer in the course of an investigation under Chapter XII of the Code shall, if reduced to writing, be signed by the person making it.

May the accused use a statement to the police to contradict a witness under Section 162 CrPC?▼

Yes. The proviso to Section 162(1) CrPC provides that when a witness is called for the prosecution at the inquiry or trial and the statement of the witness was reduced to writing in the course of the investigation, any part of the statement, if duly proved, may be used by the accused, and with the permission of the Court, by the prosecution, to contradict the witness. When any part of the statement is so used, any part of the statement may also be used in the re-examination of the witness, but for the purpose only of explaining any matter referred to in the cross-examination of the witness.

What does the Explanation to Section 162 CrPC say about an omission?▼

The Explanation provides that an omission to state a fact or circumstance in the statement referred to in Section 162(1) CrPC may amount to contradiction if the same appears to be significant and otherwise relevant having regard to the context in which such omission occurs. Whether any omission amounts to a contradiction in the particular context shall be a question of fact.

Where is Section 162 CrPC found in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?▼

From 1 July 2024, Section 162(1) CrPC maps to Section 181(1) BNSS, Section 162(2) CrPC maps to Section 181(2) BNSS, and the Explanation to Section 162 CrPC maps to the Explanation to Section 181 BNSS.

Have questions about Section 162 CrPC?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru →

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Last updated: 26 Oct 2026 ·