Section 65 IEA (Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given) is now Section 60 BSA, in force from 1 July 2024. Only the section number changed.
What Changed From IEA 65 to BSA 60?
Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 became Section 60 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 on 1 July 2024. No substantive change. The closing lines, on which kind of secondary evidence is allowed, now form an Explanation with numbered clauses.
IEA 65 vs BSA 60: Comparison Table
Aspect
IEA 1872 (repealed)
BSA 2023 (in force)
Section
65
60
Heading
Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given
Same
Cross-references
s.66
s.64
IEA 65 and BSA 60: Bare Act Text Side by Side
IEA 1872 (repealed)
Section 65, IEA 1872
65. Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given.—Secondary evidence may be given of the existence, condition, or contents of a document in the following cases:—
(a) when the original is shown or appears to be in the possession or power —
of the person against whom the document is sought to be proved, or of any person out of reach of, or not subject to, the process of the Court, or of any person legally bound to produce it, and when, after the notice mentioned in section 66, such person does not produce it;
(b) when the existence, condition or contents of the original have been proved to be admitted in writing by the person against whom it is proved or by his representative in interest;
(c) when the original has been destroyed or lost, or when the party offering evidence of its contents cannot, for any other reason not arising from his own default or neglect, produce it in reasonable time;
(d) when the original is of such a nature as not to be easily movable;
(e) when the original is a public document within the meaning of section 74;
(f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this Act, or by any other law in force in India to be given in evidence;
(g) when the originals consist of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court, and the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole collection.
In cases (a), (c) and (d), any secondary evidence of the contents of the document is admissible.
In case (b), the written admission is admissible.
In case (e) or (f), a certified copy of the document, but no other kind of secondary evidence, is admissible.
In case (g), evidence may be given as to the general result of the documents by any person who has examined them, and who is skilled in the examination of such documents.
BSA 2023 (in force)
Section 60, BSA 2023
60. Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given.—Secondary evidence may be given of the existence, condition, or contents of a document in the following cases, namely:—
(a) when the original is shown or appears to be in the possession or power—
(i) of the person against whom the document is sought to be proved; or
(ii) of any person out of reach of, or not subject to, the process of the Court; or
(iii) of any person legally bound to produce it, and when, after the notice mentioned in section 64 such person does not produce it;
(b) when the existence, condition or contents of the original have been proved to be admitted in writing by the person against whom it is proved or by his representative in interest;
(c) when the original has been destroyed or lost, or when the party offering evidence of its contents cannot, for any other reason not arising from his own default or neglect, produce it in reasonable time;
(d) when the original is of such a nature as not to be easily movable;
(e) when the original is a public document within the meaning of section 74;
(f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this Adhiniyam, or by any other law in force in India to be given in evidence;
(g) when the originals consist of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court, and the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole collection.
Explanation.—For the purposes of—
(i) clauses (a), (c) and (d), any secondary evidence of the contents of the document is admissible;
(ii) clause (b), the written admission is admissible;
(iii) clause (e) or (f), a certified copy of the document, but no other kind of secondary evidence, is admissible;
(iv) clause (g), evidence may be given as to the general result of the documents by any person who has examined them, and who is skilled in the examination of such document.
When It Applies: IEA 65 vs BSA 60
Under IEA 65
A party may give any secondary evidence of a document when the original is held or controlled by the opposing party, someone beyond court process, or someone legally bound to produce it, and that person does not produce the original after notice under Section 66 IEA.
A party may give any secondary evidence of a document when the original is destroyed or lost, or cannot be produced in reasonable time without default or neglect by the party offering the evidence, or when the original cannot be easily moved.
A party may prove what an original document states, its condition, or its existence through a written admission when that admission is proved against the opposing party or a representative in interest.
A party may give a certified copy in evidence when the original is a public document under Section 74 IEA or a document for which the Act or another Indian law permits a certified copy.
A person skilled in examining documents who has inspected numerous accounts or other documents that are too bulky for convenient inspection in court may give evidence of the overall result of the collection.
Under BSA 60
A party may give any secondary evidence of a document when the original is held or controlled by the opposing party, someone beyond court process, or someone legally bound to produce it, and that person does not produce the original after notice under Section 64 BSA.
A party may give any secondary evidence of a document when the original is destroyed or lost, or cannot be produced in reasonable time without default or neglect by the party offering the evidence, or when the original cannot be easily moved.
A party may prove what an original document states, its condition, or its existence through a written admission when that admission is proved against the opposing party or a representative in interest.
A party may give a certified copy in evidence when the original is a public document under Section 74 BSA or a document for which the Adhiniyam or another Indian law permits a certified copy.
A person skilled in examining documents who has inspected numerous accounts or other documents that are too bulky for convenient inspection in court may give evidence of the overall result of the collection.
What IEA 65 to BSA 60 Means in Practice
The same rule applies without any substantive change, and a party should cite Section 60 BSA for matters governed by the Adhiniyam. The closing lines on which form of secondary evidence is admissible in each case form an Explanation with numbered clauses in Section 60 BSA, and the notice reference in clause (a) points to Section 64 BSA instead of Section 66 IEA.
FAQs: IEA 65 to BSA 60
How did the layout of the closing rules change in Section 60 BSA?▼
They are grouped into a numbered Explanation. Section 60 BSA places the closing lines on which kind of secondary evidence is allowed into an Explanation with clauses (i) to (iv), without changing the rule.
Disclaimer: This comparison is for informational purposes only. The new criminal laws came into effect on 1 July 2024. Consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.