Section 2 BSA: Definitions
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section 2 BSA at a Glance
Section 2 BSA deals with definitions. It replaced Section 3 IEA on 1 July 2024.
Section 2 BSA Bare Act Text
2. Definitions
(1) In this Adhiniyam, unless the context otherwise requires,—
(a) “Court” includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorised to take evidence;
(b) “conclusive proof” means when one fact is declared by this Adhiniyam to be conclusive proof of another, the Court shall, on proof of the one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it;
(c) “disproved” in relation to a fact, means when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes that it does not exist, or considers its non-existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it does not exist;
(d) “document” means any matter expressed or described or otherwise recorded upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks or any other means or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used, for the purpose of recording that matter and includes electronic and digital records.
Illustrations(i) A writing is a document.
(ii) Words printed, lithographed or photographed are documents.
(iii) A map or plan is a document.
(iv) An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document.
(v) A caricature is a document.
(vi) An electronic record on emails, server logs, documents on computers, laptop or smartphone, messages, websites, locational evidence and voice mail messages stored on digital devices are documents;
(e) “evidence” means and includes—
(i) all statements including statements given electronically which the Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact under inquiry and such statements are called oral evidence;
(ii) all documents including electronic or digital records produced for the inspection of the Court and such documents are called documentary evidence;
(f) “fact” means and includes—
(i) any thing, state of things, or relation of things, capable of being perceived by the senses;
(ii) any mental condition of which any person is conscious.
Illustrations(i) That there are certain objects arranged in a certain order in a certain place, is a fact.
(ii) That a person heard or saw something, is a fact.
(iii) That a person said certain words, is a fact.
(iv) That a person holds a certain opinion, has a certain intention, acts in good faith, or fraudulently, or uses a particular word in a particular sense, or is or was at a specified time conscious of a particular sensation, is a fact;
(g) “facts in issue” means and includes any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non-existence, nature or extent of any right, liability or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding, necessarily follows.
ExplanationWhenever, under the provisions of the law for the time being in force relating to Civil Procedure, any Court records an issue of fact, the fact to be asserted or denied in the answer to such issue is a fact in issue.
IllustrationsA is accused of the murder of B. At his trial, the following facts may be in issue:—
(i) That A caused B's death.
(ii) That A intended to cause B's death.
(iii) That A had received grave and sudden provocation from B.
(iv) That A, at the time of doing the act which caused B’s death, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind, incapable of knowing its nature;
(h) “may presume”.—Whenever it is provided by this Adhiniyam that the Court may presume a fact, it may either regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved or may call for proof of it;
(i) “not proved”.—A fact is said to be not proved when it is neither proved nor disproved;
(j) “proved”.—A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists;
(k) “relevant”.—A fact is said to be relevant to another when it is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of this Adhiniyam relating to the relevancy of facts;
(l) “shall presume”.—Whenever it is directed by this Adhiniyam that the Court shall presume a fact, it shall regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved.
(2) Words and expressions used herein and not defined but defined in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000), the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 shall have the same meanings as assigned to them in the said Act and Sanhitas.
Source: Section 2, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section 2 BSA in Simple Words
Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 defines key terms used across the Adhiniyam unless the context requires otherwise. Court covers Judges, Magistrates, and persons legally authorised to take evidence, except arbitrators.
A fact is anything perceived by the senses or any conscious mental condition. One fact is relevant to another when connected as the Adhiniyam provides. Facts in issue are facts from which a right, liability, or disability necessarily follows, including factual issues recorded under Civil Procedure law.
Oral evidence covers witness statements before the Court, including electronic statements. Documentary evidence covers documents inspected by the Court, including electronic and digital records like emails, server logs, voice mail, website records, locational evidence, and computer or smartphone files and messages.
A fact is proved when the Court believes it exists or finds it probable enough for a prudent person to act on, disproved when the reverse holds, and not proved when neither holds. May presume lets the Court treat a fact as proved until disproved or demand proof. Shall presume requires treating it as proved until disproved. Conclusive proof requires treating the other fact as proved and bars contrary evidence. Section 2(2) BSA takes undefined meanings from the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the Information Technology Act, 2000.
When Section 2 BSA Applies
- Applies across the Adhiniyam whenever a defined word or expression is used, unless the context requires a different meaning.
- Applies to Judges, Magistrates, and persons with legal authority to take evidence as a Court, and treats electronic witness statements as oral evidence.
- Applies when documents, including electronic and digital records on computers, smartphones, emails, or server logs, are produced for the Court to inspect as documentary evidence.
- Applies when the Court evaluates whether a fact is proved, disproved, or not proved, applies a rule of may presume, shall presume, or conclusive proof, or looks up an undefined term in the linked statutes.
Example of Section 2 BSA
When Section 2 BSA Does Not Apply
- Does not apply the listed definitions when the context of the Adhiniyam requires a different meaning.
- Does not include arbitrators within the definition of a Court.
- Does not allow a party to give evidence to disprove a fact once another fact declared to be its conclusive proof is proved.
Section 2 BSA in the IEA (Previous Law)
Section 2 BSA replaces Section 3 IEA from the old criminal code.
Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 became Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 on 1 July 2024. The definitions of "Court", "fact", "relevant", "facts in issue", "document", "evidence", "proved", "disproved" and "not proved" now sit in lettered clauses of Section 2(1). "Document" now "includes electronic and digital records", and "evidence" now covers "statements given electronically". The definition of "India" is gone, and Section 2(2) now picks up undefined terms from the Information Technology Act, 2000, the BNSS and the BNS.
FAQs on Section 2 BSA
What is Section 2 BSA?▼
Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 is the definitions clause of the Adhiniyam. Section 2(1) BSA defines Court, conclusive proof, disproved, document, evidence, fact, facts in issue, may presume, not proved, proved, relevant, and shall presume. Section 2(2) BSA adopts undefined meanings from the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Does a mental condition count as a fact under Section 2 BSA?▼
Yes. Under Section 2(1)(f) BSA, any mental condition of which a person is conscious is a fact. This includes holding an opinion, having an intention, acting in good faith or fraudulently, or being conscious of a sensation at a specified time.
What is the difference between may presume, shall presume, and conclusive proof in Section 2 BSA?▼
May presume gives the Court a choice to treat a fact as proved until disproved or to call for proof. Shall presume requires the Court to treat the fact as proved unless and until it is disproved. Conclusive proof requires the Court to treat a fact as proved once another fact is proved, and bars any evidence to disprove it.
What is Section 2 BSA in IEA?▼
Section 3 IEA and Section 4 IEA were combined into Section 2 BSA on 1 July 2024. The general definitions from Section 3 IEA and the presumption definitions from Section 4 IEA sit together in the lettered clauses of Section 2(1) BSA. Section 2 BSA also expands document and evidence for digital records and electronic statements, drops the definition of India, and adds Section 2(2) BSA for undefined terms.
Have questions about Section 2 BSA?
Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.
Ask NyayGuru →Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 ·