Section 3 IEA: Interpretation-clause

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 3 IEA at a Glance

Section 3 IEA deals with interpretation-clause. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 2 BSA.

Section 3 IEA Bare Act Text

3. Interpretation-clause

In this Act the following words and expressions are used in the following senses, unless a contrary intention appears from the context:—

“Court”.—“Court” includes all Judges and Magistrates, and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorised to take evidence.

“Fact”.—“Fact” means and includes—(1) anything, state of things, or relation of things, capable of being perceived by the senses;

(2) any mental condition of which any person is conscious.

Illustrations

(a) That there are certain objects arranged in a certain order in a certain place, is a fact.

(b) That a man heard or saw something, is a fact.

(c) That a man said certain words, is a fact.

(d) That a man holds a certain opinion, has a certain intention, acts in good faith or fraudulently, or uses a particular word in a particular sense, or is or was at a specified time conscious of a particular sensation, is a fact.

(e) That a man has a certain reputation, is a fact.

“Relevant”.—One fact is said to be relevant to another when the one is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of this Act relating to the relevancy of facts.

“Facts in issue”.—The expression “facts in issue” means and includes—

any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non-existence, nature or extent of any right, liability, or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding, necessarily follows.

Explanation

Whenever, under the provisions of the law for the time being in force relating to Civil Procedure, any Court records an issue of fact, the fact to be asserted or denied in the answer to such issue is a fact in issue.

Illustrations

A is accused of the murder of B.

At his trial the following facts may be in issue:—

That A caused B’s death;

That A intended to cause B’s death;

That A had received grave and sudden provocation from B;

That A, at the time of doing the act which caused B’s death, was, by reason of unsoundness of mind, incapable of knowing its nature.

“Document”.—“Document” means any matter expressed or described upon any substance by means of letters, figures or marks, or by more than one of those means, intended to be used, or which may be used, for the purpose of recording that matter.

Illustrations

A writing is a document;

Words printed lithographed or photographed are documents;

A map or plan is a document;

An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document;

A caricature is a document.

“Evidence”.—“Evidence” means and includes —

(1) all statements which the Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under inquiry;

such statements are called oral evidence;

(2) all documents including electronic records produced for the inspection of the Court; such documents are called documentary evidence.

“Proved”.—A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it exists.

“Disproved”.—A fact is said to be disproved when, after considering the matters before it, the Court either believes that it does not exist, or considers its non-existence so probable that a prudent man ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to act upon the supposition that it does not exist.

“Not proved”.—A fact is said not to be proved when it is neither proved nor disproved.

“India”.—“India” means the territory of India excluding the State of Jammu and Kashmir. the expressions “Certifying Authority”, “electronic signature”, (Electronic Signature Certificate, “electronic form”, “electronic records”, “information”, “secure electronic record”, “secure digital signature” and “subscriber” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000).

Source: Section 3, Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 3 IEA in Simple Words

Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 defines key terms used across the Act unless the context shows a different intention. Court covers Judges, Magistrates, and persons legally authorised to take evidence, except arbitrators (persons chosen to settle a dispute outside court).

A fact includes anything perceived by the senses and any conscious mental condition, such as an intention, opinion, sensation, or good faith. That a person has a certain reputation is also a fact. One fact is relevant to another when connected in a way the Act recognises. Facts in issue are disputed facts from which a right, liability, or disability necessarily follows, including factual issues recorded under Civil Procedure law.

Oral evidence covers witness statements that the Court allows or requires on facts under inquiry. Documentary evidence covers documents, including electronic records, produced for the Court to inspect. A document is matter recorded on any substance by letters, figures, or marks, such as a writing, printed or photographed words, a map, an inscription, or a caricature.

A fact is proved when the Court believes it exists or finds it probable enough for a prudent person to act on, disproved when the reverse holds, and not proved when neither holds. The Act defines India as leaving out the State of Jammu and Kashmir and takes electronic record terms from the Information Technology Act, 2000.

When Section 3 IEA Applies

  • Applies throughout the Act whenever a defined word or expression appears, unless the context shows a different intention.
  • Applies to Judges, Magistrates, and other persons with legal authority to take evidence as a Court.
  • Applies when witnesses give statements that the Court allows or requires on facts under inquiry, treating those statements as oral evidence.
  • Applies when documents or electronic records are brought for the Court to inspect as documentary evidence, and when the Court decides if a fact is proved, disproved, or not proved.

Example of Section 3 IEA

In 2022, Anita sues Ramesh before a civil Judge in Jaipur over an unpaid shop rent agreement. Whether Ramesh owes the rent under that agreement is the fact in issue. During the hearing, Anita speaks as a witness and produces the signed rent agreement for the Judge to inspect. Under Section 3 IEA, the Judge is a Court, the witness statement is oral evidence, and the written agreement is documentary evidence. After weighing both pieces of evidence, the Court believes that Ramesh owes the rent and holds that fact proved.

When Section 3 IEA Does Not Apply

  • Does not apply a listed definition when the context of the Act shows a different intention.
  • Does not treat arbitrators as a Court, even when taking evidence in a dispute.
  • Does not include the State of Jammu and Kashmir within the definition of India.

Section 3 IEA in the BSA

Section 3 IEA is now covered under Section 2 BSA.

Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 became Section 2 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 on 1 July 2024. The definitions of "Court", "fact", "relevant", "facts in issue", "document", "evidence", "proved", "disproved" and "not proved" now sit in lettered clauses of Section 2(1). "Document" now "includes electronic and digital records", and "evidence" now covers "statements given electronically". The definition of "India" is gone, and Section 2(2) now picks up undefined terms from the Information Technology Act, 2000, the BNSS and the BNS.

View detailed comparison (IEA 3 vs BSA 2) →

FAQs on Section 3 IEA

What is Section 3 IEA?▼

Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is the interpretation clause that defines key terms used across the Act. It sets the legal meaning of Court, fact, relevant, facts in issue, document, evidence, proved, disproved, not proved, and India. It also adopts electronic record and signature meanings from the Information Technology Act, 2000.

Is an arbitrator a Court under Section 3 IEA?▼

No. Section 3 IEA defines Court to include Judges, Magistrates, and persons legally authorised to take evidence, but it expressly excludes arbitrators.

Does not proved mean the same as disproved under Section 3 IEA?▼

No. Under Section 3 IEA, a fact is disproved when the Court believes it does not exist or considers its non-existence probable for a prudent person. A fact is not proved when it is neither proved nor disproved.

What is Section 3 IEA in BSA?▼

Section 2 BSA replaced Section 3 IEA on 1 July 2024. The definitions from Section 3 IEA sit in lettered clauses of Section 2(1) BSA, where document includes electronic and digital records and evidence covers statements given electronically. The definition of India is gone, and Section 2(2) BSA takes undefined terms from the Information Technology Act, 2000, the BNSS, and the BNS.

Have questions about Section 3 IEA?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru →

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ·