Section 65B IEA: Admissibility of electronic records

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 65B IEA at a Glance

Section 65B IEA deals with admissibility of electronic records. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 63 BSA.

Section 65B IEA Bare Act Text

65B. Admissibility of electronic records

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, any information contained in an electronic record which is printed on a paper, stored, recorded or copied in optical or magnetic media produced by a computer (hereinafter referred to as the computer output) shall be deemed to be also a document, if the conditions mentioned in this section are satisfied in relation to the information and computer in question and shall be admissible in any proceedings, without further proof or production of the original, as evidence or any contents of the original or of any fact stated therein of which direct evidence would be admissible.

(2) The conditions referred to in sub-section (1) in respect of a computer output shall be the following, namely:β€”

(a) the computer output containing the information was produced by the computer during the period over which the computer was used regularly to store or process information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period by the person having lawful control over the use of the computer;

(b) during the said period, information of the kind contained in the electronic record or of the kind from which the information so contained is derived was regularly fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities;

(c) throughout the material part of the said period, the computer was operating properly or, if not, then in respect of any period in which it was not operating properly or was out of operation during that part of the period, was not such as to affect the electronic record or the accuracy of its contents; and

(d) the information contained in the electronic record reproduces or is derived from such information fed into the computer in the ordinary course of the said activities.

(3) Where over any period, the function of storing or processing information for the purposes of any activities regularly carried on over that period as mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) was regularly performed by computers, whetherβ€”

(a) by a combination of computers operating over that period; or

(b) by different computers operating in succession over that period; or

(c) by different combinations of computers operating in succession over that period; or

(d) in any other manner involving the successive operation over that period, in whatever order, of one or more computers and one or more combinations of computers, all the computers used for that purpose during that period shall be treated for the purposes of this section as constituting a single computer; and references in this section to a computer shall be construed accordingly.

(4) In any proceedings where it is desired to give a statement in evidence by virtue of this section, a certificate doing any of the following things, that is to say,β€”

(a) identifying the electronic record containing the statement and describing the manner in which it was produced;

(b) giving such particulars of any device involved in the production of that electronic record as may be appropriate for the purpose of showing that the electronic record was produced by a computer;

(c) dealing with any of the matters to which the conditions mentioned in sub-section (2) relate, and purporting to be signed by a person occupying a responsible official position in relation to the operation of the relevant device or the management of the relevant activities (whichever is appropriate) shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate; and for the purposes of this sub-section it shall be sufficient for a matter to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.

(5) For the purposes of this section,β€”

(a) information shall be taken to be supplied to a computer if it is supplied thereto in any appropriate form and whether it is so supplied directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment;

(b) whether in the course of activities carried on by any official, information is supplied with a view to its being stored or processed for the purposes of those activities by a computer operated otherwise than in the course of those activities, that information, if duly supplied to that computer, shall be taken to be supplied to it in the course of those activities;

(c) a computer output shall be taken to have been produced by a computer whether it was produced by it directly or (with or without human intervention) by means of any appropriate equipment.

Explanation

For the purposes of this section any reference to information being derived from other information shall be a reference to its being derived therefrom by calculation, comparison or any other process.

Source: Section 65B, Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 65B IEA in Simple Words

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 lets a party prove an electronic record in court. A party can use a paper printout or a copy on optical or magnetic media. The Act treats this computer output as a document. It is admissible (allowed as evidence in court) without the original when the conditions of Section 65B IEA are met.

Under sub-section (2), the computer must have been in regular use for activities regularly carried on by the person in lawful control of it. Data of that kind must have entered the computer regularly during those activities. The computer must have worked properly, or any fault must not have affected the record or its accuracy.

Under sub-section (3), computers used together or one after another count as one computer. Under sub-section (5), data can enter or leave through suitable equipment with or without human action. Official data sent to an outside computer also counts, and derived data includes calculation or comparison.

Under sub-section (4), a certificate supports a statement given under Section 65B IEA. A person in a responsible official position for the device or activities signs it. It identifies the record, gives device details, and covers sub-section (2) matters to the best knowledge and belief of that signer.

When Section 65B IEA Applies

  • A party in any court proceeding who wants to prove information from an electronic record using a paper printout or a copy on optical or magnetic media.
  • The computer was in regular use to store or process data for activities regularly carried on by the person in lawful control of it.
  • Data of that kind was fed into the computer regularly during those activities, and the computer worked properly or any fault did not affect the record.
  • A person in a responsible official position for the device operation or activity management signs a certificate identifying the record and device details.

Example of Section 65B IEA

In 2022, Ramesh files a suit in Pune and wants to prove payments using a paper printout of ledger entries from a company computer. That computer was regularly used during normal business to record payment data and worked properly throughout the period. Priya holds a responsible official position managing the system and signs a Section 65B(4) IEA certificate identifying the printout and device. With the Section 65B IEA conditions met, the printout is admissible in the Pune court without the original.

When Section 65B IEA Does Not Apply

  • A computer output cannot be used under Section 65B IEA to prove a fact stated in it if direct evidence of that fact would not be admissible.
  • The condition in sub-section (2)(c) is not met if the computer was out of operation or not working properly in a way that affected the electronic record or its accuracy.

Section 65B IEA in the BSA

Section 65B IEA is now covered under Section 63 BSA.

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 became Section 63 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 on 1 July 2024. Now reaches "semiconductor memory", "communication device" and records "stored, recorded or copied in any electronic form". The certificate must be in the form in the Schedule, submitted "at each instance", and signed by a person in charge of the computer or communication device or the management of the relevant activities "and an expert". The IEA asked for "a person occupying a responsible official position". Clause (5)(b) and the Explanation on derived information were dropped, and sub-section (3) was rewritten around standalone, system, network, resource and intermediary use.

View detailed comparison (IEA 65B vs BSA 63) β†’

FAQs on Section 65B IEA

What is Section 65B IEA?β–Ό

Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is the rule on the admissibility of electronic records in court. It treats a computer printout or a copy on optical or magnetic media as a document if the conditions in the section are satisfied. When those conditions are met, the output is admissible without producing the original.

What does a certificate under Section 65B(4) IEA do?β–Ό

It identifies the record, describes how it was produced, gives device details and deals with the conditions in sub-section (2). Anything stated in the certificate is evidence of that matter.

Who can sign a certificate under Section 65B(4) IEA?β–Ό

A person holding a responsible official position related to operating the relevant device or managing the relevant activities must sign the certificate. It is enough to state a matter as far as the person stating it knows and believes.

Does Section 65B IEA apply if several computers were used to process the information?β–Ό

Yes. Under Section 65B(3) IEA, if a combination of computers or different computers working one after another stored or processed the data for regular activities, all of them are treated as one single computer.

What is Section 65B IEA in BSA?β–Ό

Section 65B IEA became Section 63 BSA from 1 July 2024. Section 63 BSA expands the rule to cover semiconductor memory, communication devices, and records kept in any electronic form. It also requires a Schedule certificate submitted at each instance and signed by both the person in charge and an expert.

Have questions about Section 65B IEA?

Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.

Ask NyayGuru β†’

Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.

Sources: Bare Act Text, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Β·