Section 66 IEA: Rules as to notice to produce
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 66 IEA at a Glance
Section 66 IEA deals with rules as to notice to produce. From 1 July 2024 it is replaced by Section 64 BSA.
Section 66 IEA Bare Act Text
66. Rules as to notice to produce
Secondary evidence of the contents of the documents referred to in section 65, clause (a), shall not be given unless the party proposing to give such secondary evidence has previously given to the party in whose possession or power the document is, or to his attorney or pleader, such notice to produce it as is prescribed by law; and if no notice is prescribed by law, then such notice as the Court considers reasonable under the circumstances of the case:
Provided that such notice shall not be required in order to render secondary evidence admissible in any of the following cases, or in any other case in which the Court thinks fit to dispense with it:โ
(1) when the document to be proved is itself a notice;
(2) when, from the nature of the case, the adverse party must know that he will be required to produce it;
(3) when it appears or is proved that the adverse party has obtained possession of the original by fraud or force;
(4) when the adverse party or his agent has the original in Court;
(5) when the adverse party or his agent has admitted the loss of the document;
(6) when the person in possession of the document is out of reach of, or not subject to, the process of the Court.
Source: Section 66, Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 66 IEA in Simple Words
Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 stops a party from giving secondary evidence of a document under Section 65, clause (a) IEA unless that party first gives a notice to produce the original.
The party seeking to give secondary evidence must previously give this notice to the party who holds or controls the document, or to the attorney or pleader of that party. The notice must follow what the law prescribes, or if the law prescribes none, must be what the court finds reasonable in the case.
Under the proviso, notice is not required whenever the court thinks fit to dispense with it, or in these numbered situations: (1) the document being proved is a notice itself; (2) the nature of the dispute makes clear to the opposing party that producing the original will be required; (3) proof or circumstances show the opposing party took the original through fraud or force; (4) the opposing party or an agent has the original in court; (5) the opposing party or an agent has admitted that the original is lost; or (6) the person holding the document is beyond the reach of, or not subject to, court process.
When Section 66 IEA Applies
- A party who proposes to give secondary evidence of the contents of a document under Section 65, clause (a) IEA must first give a notice to produce the original document.
- The notice to produce must be given previously to the party who has possession or power over the document, or to the attorney or pleader of that party.
- The notice must follow what the law prescribes, or if no notice is prescribed by law, must be a notice that the court finds reasonable in the case.
Example of Section 66 IEA
When Section 66 IEA Does Not Apply
- Notice to produce is not required in any case where the court thinks fit to excuse the requirement, when the document being proved is a notice itself, or when the nature of the case makes clear to the opposing party that producing the original will be required.
- Notice to produce is not required when proof or circumstances show that the opposing party took possession of the original through fraud or force, or when the opposing party or an agent has the original in court or has admitted that the document is lost.
- Notice to produce is not required when the person who has possession of the document is beyond the reach of, or not subject to, the process of the court.
Section 66 IEA in the BSA
Section 66 IEA is now covered under Section 64 BSA.
Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 became Section 64 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 on 1 July 2024. Notice may now go to the party's "advocate or representative", where the IEA said "attorney or pleader". The six cases in the proviso are now lettered (a) to (f).
View detailed comparison (IEA 66 vs BSA 64) โFAQs on Section 66 IEA
What is Section 66 IEA?โผ
Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 requires a party to give prior notice to produce an original document before giving secondary evidence of its contents under Section 65, clause (a) IEA. It also lists the situations where this prior notice is not required.
Can the notice to produce under Section 66 IEA be given to the lawyer of the opposing party?โผ
Yes. Section 66 IEA states that the notice to produce may be given either to the party who has possession or power over the document, or to the attorney or pleader of that party.
Is a notice to produce required under Section 66 IEA if the opposing party already has the original document in the courtroom?โผ
No. Under clause (4) of the proviso to Section 66 IEA, prior notice is not required when the opposing party or an agent of that party already has the original document in court.
Is a notice to produce required under Section 66 IEA when the document to be proved is itself a notice?โผ
No. Under clause (1) of the proviso to Section 66 IEA, a party does not have to give a notice to produce when the document being proved in court is a notice itself.
What is Section 66 IEA in BSA?โผ
Section 64 BSA. It replaced Section 66 IEA from 1 July 2024, updating attorney or pleader to advocate or representative and lettering the proviso cases as (a) to (f).
Have questions about Section 66 IEA?
Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.
Ask NyayGuru โDisclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ยท