Section 46 IT Act: Power to adjudicate
Information Technology Act, 2000
Section 46 IT Act at a Glance
Section 46 IT Act requires the Central Government to appoint adjudicating officers to inquire into IT Act contraventions and impose penalties or award compensation. Adjudicating officers decide damage claims up to ₹5 crore, while larger claims go to the competent court.
Section 46 IT Act Bare Act Text
46. Power to adjudicate.
(1) For the purpose of adjudging under this Act whether any person has committed a contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or of any rule, regulation, direction or order made thereunder which renders him liable to pay penalty or compensation, the Central Government shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (3), appoint any officer not below the rank of a Director to the Government of India or an equivalent officer of a State Government to be an adjudicating officer for holding an inquiry in the manner prescribed by the Central Government.
(1A) The adjudicating officer appointed under sub-section (1) shall exercise jurisdiction to adjudicate matters in which the claim for *** damage does not exceed rupees five crore: Provided that the jurisdiction in respect of the claim for *** damage exceeding rupees five crores shall vest with the competent court.
(2) The adjudicating officer shall, after giving the person referred to in sub-section (1) a reasonable opportunity for making representation in the matter and if, on such inquiry, he is satisfied that the person has committed the contravention, he may impose such penalty or award such compensation as he thinks fit in accordance with the provisions of that section.
(3) No person shall be appointed as an adjudicating officer unless he possesses such experience in the field of Information Technology and legal or judicial experience as may be prescribed by the Central Government.
(4) Where more than one adjudicating officers are appointed, the Central Government shall specify by order the matters and places with respect to which such officers shall exercise their jurisdiction.
(5) Every adjudicating officer shall have the powers of a civil court which are conferred on the Appellate Tribunal under sub-section (2) of section 58, and—
(a) all proceedings before it shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860);
(b) shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974);
(c) shall be deemed to be a civil court for purposes of Order XXI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (5 of 1908).
Amendments to this section
- Subs. by ibid., s. 2 and Schedule, for "under this Chapter" (w.e.f. 30-11-2023).
- Subs. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 23, for "direction or order made thereunder" (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).
- Ins. by s. 23, ibid. (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).
- Words omitted "injury or" omitted by Act 18 of 2023, s. 2 and Schedule (w.e.f. 30-11-2023).
- Subs. by Act 7 of 2017, s. 169, for "Cyber Appellate Tribunal" (w.e.f. 26-5-2017).
- Ins. by Act 10 of 2009, s. 23 (w.e.f. 27-10-2009).
Section 46 IT Act in Simple Words
Section 46 IT Act sets up the adjudication system for deciding whether a person has committed a contravention under the IT Act that carries a penalty or compensation. Under sub-section (1), for deciding contraventions of any provision of the IT Act or of any rule, regulation, direction, or order made under it, the Central Government must (subject to sub-section (3)) appoint an officer not below the rank of a Director to the Government of India, or an equivalent officer of a State Government, as an adjudicating officer to hold an inquiry in the manner prescribed by the Central Government. Under sub-section (1A), the adjudicating officer has jurisdiction (legal authority to hear and decide) where the claim for damage does not exceed ₹5 crore. Under the proviso to sub-section (1A), where the claim for damage exceeds ₹5 crore, jurisdiction lies with the competent court instead.
Under sub-section (2) of Section 46 IT Act, the adjudicating officer must give the person concerned a reasonable opportunity to make a representation (to state a response) in the matter. If, after holding the inquiry, the adjudicating officer is satisfied that the person committed the contravention, the officer may impose such penalty or award such compensation as the officer considers fit, in accordance with the section under which the contravention arose.
Sub-section (3) sets a qualification bar: no person can be appointed as an adjudicating officer unless that person possesses both Information Technology experience and legal or judicial experience as prescribed by the Central Government. Under sub-section (4), where more than one adjudicating officer is appointed, the Central Government must specify by order the matters and places for which each officer exercises jurisdiction.
Sub-section (5) gives every adjudicating officer the powers of a civil court conferred on the Appellate Tribunal under Section 58(2) IT Act. Those powers cover summoning any person and examining that person on oath, requiring discovery and production of documents or electronic records, receiving evidence on affidavits, issuing commissions to examine witnesses or documents, reviewing decisions, dismissing an application for default or deciding it ex parte (in the absence of a party), and any other prescribed matter.
Under clauses (a), (b), and (c) of Section 46(5) IT Act, all proceedings before the adjudicating officer are treated as judicial proceedings within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code, and the adjudicating officer is treated as a civil court for sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and for Order XXI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. The Act still refers to the Indian Penal Code, which the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) replaced from 1 July 2024, and to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) replaced from 1 July 2024. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code are now Sections 229 and 267 BNS, and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are now Sections 384 and 385 BNSS. Section 46 IT Act was amended by Act 10 of 2009 (with effect from 27 October 2009), Act 7 of 2017 (with effect from 26 May 2017), and Act 18 of 2023 (with effect from 30 November 2023).
When Section 46 IT Act Applies
- The matter involves a contravention of the IT Act, or a rule, regulation, direction, or order made under it, rendering a person liable to pay a penalty or compensation.
- The Central Government appoints an officer not below the rank of Director to the Government of India (or an equivalent State Government officer) possessing the prescribed Information Technology and legal or judicial experience.
- The claim for damage does not exceed ₹5 crore; claims exceeding ₹5 crore vest with the competent court.
- The adjudicating officer gives the person a reasonable opportunity to make a representation and holds an inquiry in the manner prescribed by the Central Government.
- If satisfied on inquiry that the contravention was committed, the adjudicating officer may impose a penalty or award compensation in accordance with the relevant section, exercising civil-court powers under Section 58(2) IT Act.
Example of Section 46 IT Act
When Section 46 IT Act Does Not Apply
- Under the proviso to Section 46(1A) IT Act, an adjudicating officer has no jurisdiction where the claim for damage exceeds ₹5 crore; jurisdiction in such matters lies with the competent court.
- Under Section 46(3) IT Act, a person cannot be appointed as an adjudicating officer unless that person possesses the Information Technology experience and legal or judicial experience prescribed by the Central Government.
FAQs on Section 46 IT Act
What is Section 46 IT Act?▼
Section 46 IT Act provides for the appointment of adjudicating officers to inquire into contraventions of the IT Act, or its rules, regulations, directions, or orders, that carry a penalty or compensation. It sets the ₹5 crore jurisdiction limit for damage claims, the inquiry procedure, qualification requirements, and civil-court powers.
What is the maximum damage claim an adjudicating officer can decide under Section 46 IT Act?▼
Up to ₹5 crore. Under Section 46(1A) IT Act, the adjudicating officer exercises jurisdiction where the claim for damage does not exceed ₹5 crore, and under the proviso, claims exceeding ₹5 crore go to the competent court.
Who can be appointed as an adjudicating officer under Section 46 IT Act?▼
An officer not below the rank of a Director to the Government of India or an equivalent officer of a State Government. Under Section 46(3) IT Act, the appointee must also possess the Information Technology experience and legal or judicial experience prescribed by the Central Government.
Must the adjudicating officer hear the person accused of a contravention before imposing a penalty?▼
Yes. Under Section 46(2) IT Act, the adjudicating officer must give the person a reasonable opportunity for making a representation and be satisfied on inquiry that the contravention was committed before imposing a penalty or awarding compensation.
Does an adjudicating officer have the powers of a civil court under Section 46 IT Act?▼
Yes. Under Section 46(5) IT Act, every adjudicating officer has the civil-court powers conferred on the Appellate Tribunal under Section 58(2) IT Act, including summoning and examining persons on oath and requiring production of documents or electronic records. Section 46(5) IT Act also treats the officer as a civil court for Order XXI of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 and sections 345 and 346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Have questions about Section 46 IT Act?
Ask NyayGuru about your situation and get an answer based on the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Ask NyayGuru →Disclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Information Technology Act, 2000 ·