Section 64 BSA: Rules as to notice to produce
Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section 64 BSA at a Glance
Section 64 BSA deals with rules as to notice to produce. It replaced Section 66 IEA on 1 July 2024.
Section 64 BSA Bare Act Text
64. Rules as to notice to produce
Secondary evidence of the contents of the documents referred to in clause (a) of section 60, shall not be given unless the party proposing to give such secondary evidence has previously given to the party in whose possession or power the document is, or to his advocate or representative, such notice to produce it as is prescribed by law; and if no notice is prescribed by law, then such notice as the Court considers reasonable under the circumstances of the case:
Provided that such notice shall not be required in order to render secondary evidence admissible in any of the following cases, or in any other case in which the Court thinks fit to dispense with it:โ
(a) when the document to be proved is itself a notice;
(b) when, from the nature of the case, the adverse party must know that he will be required to produce it;
(c) when it appears or is proved that the adverse party has obtained possession of the original by fraud or force;
(d) when the adverse party or his agent has the original in Court;
(e) when the adverse party or his agent has admitted the loss of the document;
(f) when the person in possession of the document is out of reach of, or not subject to, the process of the Court.
Source: Section 64, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Section 64 BSA in Simple Words
Section 64 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 stops a party from giving secondary evidence of a document under clause (a) of Section 60 BSA unless that party first gives a notice to produce the original.
The party seeking to give secondary evidence must previously give this notice to the party who holds or controls the document, or to the advocate or representative of that party. The notice must follow what the law prescribes, or if the law prescribes none, must be what the court finds reasonable in the case.
Under the proviso, notice is not required whenever the court thinks fit to dispense with it, or in these lettered situations: (a) the document being proved is a notice itself; (b) the nature of the dispute makes clear to the opposing party that producing the original will be required; (c) proof or circumstances show the opposing party took the original through fraud or force; (d) the opposing party or an agent has the original in court; (e) the opposing party or an agent has admitted that the original is lost; or (f) the person holding the document is beyond the reach of, or not subject to, court process.
When Section 64 BSA Applies
- A party who proposes to give secondary evidence of the contents of a document under clause (a) of Section 60 BSA must first give a notice to produce the original document.
- The notice to produce must be given previously to the party who has possession or power over the document, or to the advocate or representative of that party.
- The notice must follow what the law prescribes, or if no notice is prescribed by law, must be a notice that the court finds reasonable in the case.
Example of Section 64 BSA
When Section 64 BSA Does Not Apply
- Notice to produce is not required in any case where the court thinks fit to excuse the requirement, when the document being proved is a notice itself, or when the nature of the case makes clear to the opposing party that producing the original will be required.
- Notice to produce is not required when proof or circumstances show that the opposing party took possession of the original through fraud or force, or when the opposing party or an agent has the original in court or has admitted that the document is lost.
- Notice to produce is not required when the person who has possession of the document is beyond the reach of, or not subject to, the process of the court.
Section 64 BSA in the IEA (Previous Law)
Section 64 BSA replaces Section 66 IEA from the old criminal code.
Section 66 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 became Section 64 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 on 1 July 2024. Notice may now go to the party's "advocate or representative", where the IEA said "attorney or pleader". The six cases in the proviso are now lettered (a) to (f).
FAQs on Section 64 BSA
What is Section 64 BSA?โผ
Section 64 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 requires a party to give prior notice to produce an original document before giving secondary evidence of its contents under clause (a) of Section 60 BSA. It also lists the situations where this prior notice is not required.
Can a notice to produce under Section 64 BSA be given to the advocate or representative of the party holding the document?โผ
Yes. Section 64 BSA allows the notice to produce to be given either to the party who has possession or power over the document, or to the advocate or representative of that party.
Is prior notice required under Section 64 BSA if the opposing party took the original document by fraud or force?โผ
No. Under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 64 BSA, prior notice is not required when proof or circumstances show that the opposing party took possession of the original document through fraud or force.
Can the court excuse a party from giving a notice to produce under Section 64 BSA in situations not listed in clauses (a) to (f)?โผ
Yes. The proviso to Section 64 BSA allows the court to dispense with the notice requirement in any other situation where the court finds it appropriate to excuse prior notice.
What is Section 64 BSA in IEA?โผ
Section 66 IEA. Section 64 BSA replaced Section 66 IEA on 1 July 2024, changing attorney or pleader to advocate or representative and lettering the proviso cases as (a) to (f).
Have questions about Section 64 BSA?
Ask NyayGuru for a plain language explanation, or how it applies to your situation.
Ask NyayGuru โDisclaimer: This is for informational purposes only. Always consult a qualified advocate for legal advice.
Sources: Bare Act Text, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 ยท